FNPIX vs. XLF

In the year-to-date period, FNPIX achieves a -2.43% return, which is significantly lower than XLF's -0.28% return. Over the past 10 years, FNPIX has underperformed XLF with an annualized return of 10.82%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.86% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FNPIX has a 1.72% expense ratio, which is higher than XLF's 0.13% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund (FNPIX) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FNPIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the XLF Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNPIX and XLF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FNPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than XLF's 1.48% yield.

The maximum FNPIX drawdown since its inception was -93.14%, which is greater than XLF's maximum drawdown of -82.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNPIX and XLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund (FNPIX) has a higher volatility of 20.48% compared to Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) at 13.51%. This indicates that FNPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.