WCPB vs. DBND
WCPB (Weitz Core Plus Bond ETF) and DBND (DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. WCPB is actively managed, while DBND is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. WCPB charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DBND.
Performance
WCPB vs. DBND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WCPB achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly higher than DBND's -0.62% return.
WCPB
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 0.71%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
DBND
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -1.18%
- 6M
- -0.89%
- YTD
- -0.62%
- 1Y
- 2.62%
- 3Y*
- 4.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.24%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.55M | $2.92M | $3.27M | |
| $2.08M | $1.78M | $1.23M |
WCPB vs. DBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WCPB Weitz Core Plus Bond ETF | 0.71% | 3.01% |
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF | -0.62% | 2.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between WCPB and DBND is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2025 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WCPB vs. DBND — Risk / Return Rank
WCPB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DBND
WCPB vs. DBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Weitz Core Plus Bond ETF (WCPB) and DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WCPB | DBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.14 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.93 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.24 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WCPB vs. DBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WCPB drawdown since its inception was -2.64%, smaller than the maximum DBND drawdown of -9.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCPB and DBND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WCPB | DBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.64% | -9.39% | +6.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.26% | -2.20% | +0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.58% | -2.25% | +1.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.17% | — |
Volatility
WCPB vs. DBND - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WCPB | DBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.92% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.57% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.86% | 3.25% | +0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.86% | 5.04% | -1.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.86% | 5.04% | -1.18% |
WCPB vs. DBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
WCPB has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than DBND's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
WCPB vs. DBND - Dividend Comparison
WCPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, less than DBND's 4.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF | 4.81% | 4.78% | 5.19% | 4.39% | 2.74% |
WCPB Weitz Core Plus Bond ETF | 3.60% | 1.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, WCPB and DBND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, WCPB is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WCPB is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DBND.
DBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.81%, compared with 3.60% for WCPB.
They also come from different issuers: Weitz and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WCPB and 0.50% for DBND.
Find the right allocation for WCPB and DBND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer