PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WCOG.L vs. UC15.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WCOG.L vs. UC15.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD (WCOG.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCOG.L achieves a 31.19% return, which is significantly higher than UC15.L's 21.49% return. Over the past 10 years, WCOG.L has underperformed UC15.L with an annualized return of 8.85%, while UC15.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.68% annualized return.


WCOG.L

1D
-1.18%
1M
-1.93%
YTD
31.19%
6M
31.55%
1Y
45.33%
3Y*
13.10%
5Y*
12.72%
10Y*
8.85%

UC15.L

1D
-1.31%
1M
-0.91%
YTD
21.49%
6M
22.05%
1Y
32.45%
3Y*
10.32%
5Y*
12.77%
10Y*
9.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCOG.L vs. UC15.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WCOG.L
WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD
31.19%7.94%4.45%-12.14%26.35%28.38%-2.08%3.07%-3.67%-4.31%
UC15.L
UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
21.49%2.57%6.44%-6.52%29.97%36.11%-2.49%5.31%-5.25%-2.80%

Correlation

The correlation between WCOG.L and UC15.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2016

0.89

The correlation between WCOG.L and UC15.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WCOG.L vs. UC15.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCOG.L
WCOG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
WCOG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WCOG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
WCOG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
WCOG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
WCOG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

UC15.L
UC15.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
UC15.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC15.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC15.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
UC15.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC15.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCOG.L vs. UC15.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD (WCOG.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WCOG.LUC15.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.39

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.62

5.23

+1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.47

13.93

+2.54

WCOG.L vs. UC15.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCOG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the UC15.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCOG.L and UC15.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WCOG.LUC15.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

2.12

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.87

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.66

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.33

+0.31

Drawdowns

WCOG.L vs. UC15.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCOG.L drawdown since its inception was -27.05%, smaller than the maximum UC15.L drawdown of -42.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCOG.L and UC15.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WCOG.LUC15.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.05%

-42.93%

+15.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.82%

-6.18%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.63%

-13.98%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.05%

-17.43%

-9.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.05%

-30.26%

+3.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.73%

-3.53%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.98%

-15.17%

+4.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

2.32%

+0.43%

Volatility

WCOG.L vs. UC15.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD (WCOG.L) has a higher volatility of 6.08% compared to UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L) at 5.07%. This indicates that WCOG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UC15.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WCOG.LUC15.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.08%

5.07%

+1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.70%

12.34%

+3.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.93%

15.26%

+2.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.33%

14.69%

+0.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.02%

14.80%

-0.78%

WCOG.L vs. UC15.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCOG.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than UC15.L's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

WCOG.L vs. UC15.L - Dividend Comparison

WCOG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, while UC15.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
UC15.L
UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WCOG.L
WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD
2.68%4.56%4.54%0.65%0.00%0.30%1.64%1.64%0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


WCOG.L and UC15.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UC15.L is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UC15.L is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for WCOG.L.

WCOG.L tracks Optimised Roll Commodity, while UC15.L tracks UBS CMCI. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for WCOG.L and 0.34% for UC15.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WCOG.L and UC15.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer