WCOD.L vs. USDV.L
WCOD.L (SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF) and USDV.L (SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis) are both exchange-traded funds - WCOD.L is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while USDV.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WCOD.L returned 11.13%/yr vs 9.04%/yr for USDV.L. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WCOD.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for USDV.L.
Performance
WCOD.L vs. USDV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
WCOD.L is traded in USD, while USDV.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the USDV.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WCOD.L achieves a -2.54% return, which is significantly lower than USDV.L's 6.96% return. Over the past 10 years, WCOD.L has outperformed USDV.L with an annualized return of 11.13%, while USDV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.04% annualized return.
WCOD.L
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- YTD
- -2.54%
- 6M
- -1.31%
- 1Y
- 8.23%
- 3Y*
- 12.82%
- 5Y*
- 4.86%
- 10Y*
- 11.13%
USDV.L
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 6.96%
- 6M
- 7.95%
- 1Y
- 12.93%
- 3Y*
- 9.69%
- 5Y*
- 5.66%
- 10Y*
- 9.04%
WCOD.L vs. USDV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WCOD.L SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF | -2.54% | 8.15% | 21.52% | 35.76% | -33.88% | 18.10% | 37.61% | 25.41% | -5.63% | 23.02% |
USDV.L SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis | 6.96% | 8.78% | 7.52% | 1.58% | -0.35% | 25.59% | 0.26% | 24.49% | -4.25% | 16.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between WCOD.L and USDV.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2016 | 0.32 |
WCOD.L vs. USDV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WCOD.L
USDV.L
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
WCOD.L
USDV.L
Technology
WCOD.L
USDV.L
Consumer Defensive
WCOD.L
USDV.L
Communication Services
WCOD.L
USDV.L
Industrials
WCOD.L
USDV.L
Basic Materials
WCOD.L
-
USDV.L
Energy
WCOD.L
-
USDV.L
Financial Services
WCOD.L
-
USDV.L
Healthcare
WCOD.L
-
USDV.L
Real Estate
WCOD.L
-
USDV.L
Utilities
WCOD.L
-
USDV.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WCOD.L vs. USDV.L — Risk / Return Rank
WCOD.L
USDV.L
WCOD.L vs. USDV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF (WCOD.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WCOD.L | USDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.23 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.51 | 1.85 | -1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.51 | 4.63 | -3.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WCOD.L | USDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 | 1.34 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.41 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.57 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.74 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
WCOD.L vs. USDV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WCOD.L drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, roughly equal to the maximum USDV.L drawdown of -35.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCOD.L and USDV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WCOD.L | USDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.26% | -35.73% | -0.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.19% | -6.96% | -9.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.04% | -15.11% | -7.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.26% | -15.11% | -21.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.26% | -35.73% | -0.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.91% | -3.75% | -2.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.44% | -3.39% | -5.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.42% | 2.79% | +2.63% |
Volatility
WCOD.L vs. USDV.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF (WCOD.L) has a higher volatility of 5.99% compared to SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L) at 2.40%. This indicates that WCOD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USDV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WCOD.L | USDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.99% | 2.40% | +3.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.97% | 6.87% | +7.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.70% | 9.63% | +8.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.42% | 13.84% | +10.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.43% | 15.76% | +9.67% |
WCOD.L vs. USDV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WCOD.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than USDV.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
WCOD.L vs. USDV.L - Dividend Comparison
WCOD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USDV.L SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis | 2.04% | 2.20% | 1.99% | 2.29% | 2.11% | 2.12% | 2.57% | 2.65% | 2.19% | 3.07% | 1.65% | 2.00% |
WCOD.L SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WCOD.L and USDV.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WCOD.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WCOD.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for USDV.L.
WCOD.L is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while USDV.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. WCOD.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while USDV.L tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WCOD.L and 0.35% for USDV.L.
Find the right allocation for WCOD.L and USDV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer