PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WCOD.L vs. USDV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WCOD.L vs. USDV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF (WCOD.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WCOD.L is traded in USD, while USDV.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the USDV.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCOD.L achieves a -2.54% return, which is significantly lower than USDV.L's 6.96% return. Over the past 10 years, WCOD.L has outperformed USDV.L with an annualized return of 11.13%, while USDV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.04% annualized return.


WCOD.L

1D
0.80%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
-2.54%
6M
-1.31%
1Y
8.23%
3Y*
12.82%
5Y*
4.86%
10Y*
11.13%

USDV.L

1D
0.18%
1M
0.89%
YTD
6.96%
6M
7.95%
1Y
12.93%
3Y*
9.69%
5Y*
5.66%
10Y*
9.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCOD.L vs. USDV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WCOD.L
SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF
-2.54%8.15%21.52%35.76%-33.88%18.10%37.61%25.41%-5.63%23.02%
USDV.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
6.96%8.78%7.52%1.58%-0.35%25.59%0.26%24.49%-4.25%16.89%

Correlation

The correlation between WCOD.L and USDV.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2016

0.32

WCOD.L vs. USDV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WCOD.L
USDV.L

Consumer Cyclical

96.3%
5.2%

Technology

2.9%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

0.6%
17.0%

Communication Services

0.1%
3.5%

Industrials

0.1%
17.5%

Basic Materials

-

6.4%

Energy

-

4.5%

Financial Services

-

11.5%

Healthcare

-

6.2%

Real Estate

-

4.6%

Utilities

-

14.8%

Consumer Cyclical

WCOD.L
96.3%
USDV.L
5.2%

Technology

WCOD.L
2.9%
USDV.L
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

WCOD.L
0.6%
USDV.L
17.0%

Communication Services

WCOD.L
0.1%
USDV.L
3.5%

Industrials

WCOD.L
0.1%
USDV.L
17.5%

Basic Materials

WCOD.L

-

USDV.L
6.4%

Energy

WCOD.L

-

USDV.L
4.5%

Financial Services

WCOD.L

-

USDV.L
11.5%

Healthcare

WCOD.L

-

USDV.L
6.2%

Real Estate

WCOD.L

-

USDV.L
4.6%

Utilities

WCOD.L

-

USDV.L
14.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WCOD.L vs. USDV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCOD.L
WCOD.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
WCOD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WCOD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
WCOD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
WCOD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
WCOD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

USDV.L
USDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
USDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
USDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
USDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
USDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCOD.L vs. USDV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF (WCOD.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WCOD.LUSDV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.23

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.51

1.85

-1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.51

4.63

-3.12

WCOD.L vs. USDV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCOD.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the USDV.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCOD.L and USDV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WCOD.LUSDV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

1.34

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.41

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.57

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.74

+0.04

Drawdowns

WCOD.L vs. USDV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCOD.L drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, roughly equal to the maximum USDV.L drawdown of -35.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCOD.L and USDV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WCOD.LUSDV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.26%

-35.73%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.19%

-6.96%

-9.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.04%

-15.11%

-7.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.26%

-15.11%

-21.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.26%

-35.73%

-0.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.91%

-3.75%

-2.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.44%

-3.39%

-5.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.42%

2.79%

+2.63%

Volatility

WCOD.L vs. USDV.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF (WCOD.L) has a higher volatility of 5.99% compared to SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L) at 2.40%. This indicates that WCOD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USDV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WCOD.LUSDV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.99%

2.40%

+3.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.97%

6.87%

+7.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.70%

9.63%

+8.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.42%

13.84%

+10.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.43%

15.76%

+9.67%

WCOD.L vs. USDV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCOD.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than USDV.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

WCOD.L vs. USDV.L - Dividend Comparison

WCOD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
USDV.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
2.04%2.20%1.99%2.29%2.11%2.12%2.57%2.65%2.19%3.07%1.65%2.00%
WCOD.L
SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WCOD.L and USDV.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WCOD.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WCOD.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for USDV.L.

WCOD.L is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while USDV.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. WCOD.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while USDV.L tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WCOD.L and 0.35% for USDV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WCOD.L and USDV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer