WCOD.L vs. SXLY.L
WCOD.L (SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF) and SXLY.L (SPDR S&P US Consumer Discretionary Select Sector UCITS ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds from State Street tracking the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WCOD.L returned 11.13%/yr vs 13.42%/yr for SXLY.L. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WCOD.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SXLY.L.
Performance
WCOD.L vs. SXLY.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WCOD.L achieves a -2.54% return, which is significantly lower than SXLY.L's -0.37% return. Over the past 10 years, WCOD.L has underperformed SXLY.L with an annualized return of 11.13%, while SXLY.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.42% annualized return.
WCOD.L
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- YTD
- -2.54%
- 6M
- -1.31%
- 1Y
- 8.23%
- 3Y*
- 12.82%
- 5Y*
- 4.86%
- 10Y*
- 11.13%
SXLY.L
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -1.45%
- YTD
- -0.37%
- 6M
- 1.12%
- 1Y
- 13.34%
- 3Y*
- 17.11%
- 5Y*
- 9.33%
- 10Y*
- 13.42%
WCOD.L vs. SXLY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WCOD.L SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF | -2.54% | 8.15% | 21.52% | 35.76% | -33.88% | 18.10% | 37.61% | 25.41% | -5.63% | 23.02% |
SXLY.L SPDR S&P US Consumer Discretionary Select Sector UCITS ETF | -0.37% | 8.34% | 29.22% | 41.53% | -34.41% | 27.96% | 28.33% | 27.87% | 0.68% | 22.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between WCOD.L and SXLY.L is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2016 | 0.61 |
Over the past year, WCOD.L and SXLY.L have become more correlated (0.97) than their long-term average of 0.61, meaning their price movements have been converging.
WCOD.L vs. SXLY.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WCOD.L
SXLY.L
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
WCOD.L
SXLY.L
Technology
WCOD.L
SXLY.L
Consumer Defensive
WCOD.L
SXLY.L
-
Communication Services
WCOD.L
SXLY.L
-
Industrials
WCOD.L
SXLY.L
Basic Materials
WCOD.L
-
SXLY.L
-
Energy
WCOD.L
-
SXLY.L
-
Financial Services
WCOD.L
-
SXLY.L
-
Healthcare
WCOD.L
-
SXLY.L
-
Real Estate
WCOD.L
-
SXLY.L
-
Utilities
WCOD.L
-
SXLY.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WCOD.L vs. SXLY.L — Risk / Return Rank
WCOD.L
SXLY.L
WCOD.L vs. SXLY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF (WCOD.L) and SPDR S&P US Consumer Discretionary Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WCOD.L | SXLY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.13 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.51 | 0.88 | -0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.51 | 2.69 | -1.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WCOD.L | SXLY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 | 0.72 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.41 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.64 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.60 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
WCOD.L vs. SXLY.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WCOD.L drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, roughly equal to the maximum SXLY.L drawdown of -37.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCOD.L and SXLY.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WCOD.L | SXLY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.26% | -37.79% | +1.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.19% | -15.06% | -1.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.04% | -25.31% | +2.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.26% | -37.79% | +1.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.26% | -37.79% | +1.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.91% | -4.33% | -1.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.44% | -7.89% | -0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.42% | 4.95% | +0.47% |
Volatility
WCOD.L vs. SXLY.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF (WCOD.L) and SPDR S&P US Consumer Discretionary Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLY.L) have volatilities of 5.99% and 6.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WCOD.L | SXLY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.99% | 6.13% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.97% | 14.49% | -0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.70% | 18.52% | -0.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.42% | 22.52% | +1.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.43% | 21.10% | +4.33% |
WCOD.L vs. SXLY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WCOD.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SXLY.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
WCOD.L vs. SXLY.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither WCOD.L nor SXLY.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, WCOD.L and SXLY.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SXLY.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SXLY.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WCOD.L.
Both ETFs track Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WCOD.L and 0.15% for SXLY.L.
Find the right allocation for WCOD.L and SXLY.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer