WCOD.L vs. ICDU.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WCOD.L (SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF) and ICDU.L (iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - WCOD.L tracks the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR while ICDU.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Discretionary Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WCOD.L returned 11.13%/yr vs 12.96%/yr for ICDU.L. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WCOD.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for ICDU.L.

Performance

WCOD.L vs. ICDU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF (WCOD.L) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICDU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

WCOD.L is traded in USD, while ICDU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ICDU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCOD.L achieves a -2.54% return, which is significantly lower than ICDU.L's -0.76% return. Over the past 10 years, WCOD.L has underperformed ICDU.L with an annualized return of 11.13%, while ICDU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.96% annualized return.

WCOD.L

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: -0.41%
• YTD: -2.54%
• 6M: -1.31%
• 1Y: 8.23%
• 3Y*: 12.82%
• 5Y*: 4.86%
• 10Y*: 11.13%

ICDU.L

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -0.95%
• YTD: -0.76%
• 6M: 0.92%
• 1Y: 12.26%
• 3Y*: 16.98%
• 5Y*: 8.18%
• 10Y*: 12.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCOD.L vs. ICDU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WCOD.L SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF	-2.54%	8.15%	21.52%	35.76%	-33.88%	18.10%	37.61%	25.41%	-5.63%	23.02%
ICDU.L iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	-0.76%	6.72%	30.84%	42.88%	-37.19%	24.83%	32.90%	27.75%	-0.41%	22.02%

Correlation

The correlation between WCOD.L and ICDU.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2016	0.59

Over the past year, WCOD.L and ICDU.L have become more correlated (0.93) than their long-term average of 0.59, meaning their price movements have been converging.

WCOD.L vs. ICDU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WCOD.L	ICDU.L
Consumer Cyclical	96.3%	97.6%
Technology	2.9%	0.8%
Consumer Defensive	0.6%	-
Communication Services	0.1%	1.3%
Industrials	0.1%	0.1%
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

WCOD.L vs. ICDU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCOD.L

WCOD.L Risk / Return Rank: 16
WCOD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
WCOD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
WCOD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 16
WCOD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
WCOD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 16

ICDU.L

ICDU.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
ICDU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
ICDU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
ICDU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 22
ICDU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
ICDU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCOD.L vs. ICDU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF (WCOD.L) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICDU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WCOD.L	ICDU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.46	0.70	-0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.79	1.11	-0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.12	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.51	0.81	-0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.51	2.50	-0.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WCOD.L vs. ICDU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCOD.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the ICDU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCOD.L and ICDU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WCOD.L	ICDU.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46	0.70	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	0.37	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77	0.62	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	0.58	+0.20

Drawdowns

WCOD.L vs. ICDU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCOD.L drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, smaller than the maximum ICDU.L drawdown of -40.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCOD.L and ICDU.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	WCOD.L	ICDU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.26%	-40.66%	+4.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.19%	-14.99%	-1.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.04%	-26.60%	+3.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.26%	-40.66%	+4.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.26%	-40.66%	+4.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.91%	-4.49%	-1.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.44%	-8.76%	+0.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.42%	4.89%	+0.53%

Volatility

WCOD.L vs. ICDU.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF (WCOD.L) has a higher volatility of 5.99% compared to iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICDU.L) at 5.52%. This indicates that WCOD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICDU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WCOD.L	ICDU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.99%	5.52%	+0.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.97%	13.43%	+0.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.70%	17.57%	+0.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.42%	22.29%	+2.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.43%	20.85%	+4.58%

WCOD.L vs. ICDU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCOD.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ICDU.L's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

WCOD.L vs. ICDU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WCOD.L nor ICDU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WCOD.L and ICDU.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, WCOD.L and ICDU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, WCOD.L or ICDU.L?

On fees, ICDU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WCOD.L or ICDU.L?

ICDU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WCOD.L.

What is the main difference between WCOD.L and ICDU.L?

WCOD.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while ICDU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Discretionary Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WCOD.L and 0.15% for ICDU.L.