WCME vs. QCLN
WCME (First Trust WCM Developing World Equity ETF) and QCLN (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - WCME is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Actively Managed, while QCLN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, WCME returned 30.37% vs 120.21% for QCLN. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WCME charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QCLN.
Performance
WCME vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WCME achieves a 14.93% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN's 52.94% return.
WCME
- 1D
- -2.35%
- 1M
- 4.53%
- YTD
- 14.93%
- 6M
- 15.02%
- 1Y
- 30.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QCLN
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 16.40%
- YTD
- 52.94%
- 6M
- 50.79%
- 1Y
- 120.21%
- 3Y*
- 12.03%
- 5Y*
- 2.16%
- 10Y*
- 17.39%
WCME vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
WCME First Trust WCM Developing World Equity ETF | 14.93% | 35.19% | -10.72% |
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund | 52.94% | 31.81% | -3.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between WCME and QCLN is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2024 | 0.63 |
The correlation between WCME and QCLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
WCME vs. QCLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WCME
QCLN
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
-
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
WCME
QCLN
Financial Services
WCME
QCLN
Consumer Cyclical
WCME
QCLN
Healthcare
WCME
QCLN
-
Industrials
WCME
QCLN
Basic Materials
WCME
QCLN
Energy
WCME
QCLN
Communication Services
WCME
QCLN
-
Utilities
WCME
QCLN
Consumer Defensive
WCME
QCLN
-
Real Estate
WCME
-
QCLN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WCME vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank
WCME
QCLN
WCME vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust WCM Developing World Equity ETF (WCME) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WCME | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.48 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 7.62 | -5.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.96 | 26.28 | -19.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WCME | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 3.49 | -1.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 0.20 | +0.92 |
Drawdowns
WCME vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WCME drawdown since its inception was -15.64%, smaller than the maximum QCLN drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCME and QCLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WCME | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.64% | -76.18% | +60.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.64% | -15.86% | +0.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -56.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -69.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -71.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.35% | -20.99% | +18.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.67% | -43.45% | +39.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.38% | 4.59% | -0.21% |
Volatility
WCME vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust WCM Developing World Equity ETF (WCME) is 8.11%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a volatility of 12.56%. This indicates that WCME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WCME | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.11% | 12.56% | -4.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.23% | 26.02% | -8.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.16% | 34.88% | -14.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.74% | 37.97% | -18.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.74% | 34.91% | -15.17% |
WCME vs. QCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
WCME has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QCLN's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
WCME vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison
WCME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, more than QCLN's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund | 0.15% | 0.25% | 0.87% | 0.76% | 0.33% | 0.01% | 0.30% | 0.85% | 1.03% | 0.45% | 1.24% | 0.72% |
WCME First Trust WCM Developing World Equity ETF | 0.60% | 0.68% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WCME and QCLN have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QCLN has higher volatility (12.56%) compared to WCME (8.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCME dropped -15.64% vs QCLN's -76.18%.
On 1-year performance, QCLN leads with 120.21% vs 30.37% for WCME. On fees, QCLN is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, WCME has been the lower-risk option at 8.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QCLN has performed better with a 120.21% return vs 30.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QCLN is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WCME.
WCME has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.15% for QCLN.
WCME is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while QCLN is Alternative Energy Equities. WCME tracks Actively Managed, while QCLN tracks NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WCME and 0.60% for QCLN.
QCLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.49 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WCME and QCLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer