PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WCME vs. QCLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WCME vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust WCM Developing World Equity ETF (WCME) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCME achieves a 14.93% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN's 52.94% return.


WCME

1D
-2.35%
1M
4.53%
YTD
14.93%
6M
15.02%
1Y
30.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QCLN

1D
-0.41%
1M
16.40%
YTD
52.94%
6M
50.79%
1Y
120.21%
3Y*
12.03%
5Y*
2.16%
10Y*
17.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCME vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WCME and QCLN is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2024

0.63

The correlation between WCME and QCLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

WCME vs. QCLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WCME
QCLN

Technology

32.4%
20.8%

Financial Services

16.9%
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

12.6%
9.4%

Healthcare

11.0%

-

Industrials

8.7%
30.2%

Basic Materials

6.5%
9.4%

Energy

5.0%
13.2%

Communication Services

3.6%

-

Utilities

3.2%
13.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

WCME
32.4%
QCLN
20.8%

Financial Services

WCME
16.9%
QCLN
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

WCME
12.6%
QCLN
9.4%

Healthcare

WCME
11.0%
QCLN

-

Industrials

WCME
8.7%
QCLN
30.2%

Basic Materials

WCME
6.5%
QCLN
9.4%

Energy

WCME
5.0%
QCLN
13.2%

Communication Services

WCME
3.6%
QCLN

-

Utilities

WCME
3.2%
QCLN
13.2%

Consumer Defensive

WCME
3.0%
QCLN

-

Real Estate

WCME

-

QCLN

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WCME vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCME
WCME Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
WCME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WCME Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
WCME Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
WCME Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
WCME Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

QCLN
QCLN Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
QCLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
QCLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCLN Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCME vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust WCM Developing World Equity ETF (WCME) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WCMEQCLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.48

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

7.62

-5.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.96

26.28

-19.33

WCME vs. QCLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCME Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the QCLN Sharpe Ratio of 3.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCME and QCLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WCMEQCLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

3.49

-1.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

0.20

+0.92

Drawdowns

WCME vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCME drawdown since its inception was -15.64%, smaller than the maximum QCLN drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCME and QCLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WCMEQCLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.64%

-76.18%

+60.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.64%

-15.86%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.35%

-20.99%

+18.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.67%

-43.45%

+39.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

4.59%

-0.21%

Volatility

WCME vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust WCM Developing World Equity ETF (WCME) is 8.11%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a volatility of 12.56%. This indicates that WCME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WCMEQCLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.11%

12.56%

-4.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.23%

26.02%

-8.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.16%

34.88%

-14.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.74%

37.97%

-18.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.74%

34.91%

-15.17%

WCME vs. QCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCME has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QCLN's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

WCME vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison

WCME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, more than QCLN's 0.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
0.15%0.25%0.87%0.76%0.33%0.01%0.30%0.85%1.03%0.45%1.24%0.72%
WCME
First Trust WCM Developing World Equity ETF
0.60%0.68%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WCME and QCLN have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QCLN has higher volatility (12.56%) compared to WCME (8.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCME dropped -15.64% vs QCLN's -76.18%.

On 1-year performance, QCLN leads with 120.21% vs 30.37% for WCME. On fees, QCLN is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, WCME has been the lower-risk option at 8.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QCLN has performed better with a 120.21% return vs 30.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QCLN is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WCME.

WCME has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.15% for QCLN.

WCME is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while QCLN is Alternative Energy Equities. WCME tracks Actively Managed, while QCLN tracks NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WCME and 0.60% for QCLN.

QCLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.49 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WCME and QCLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer