PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WCME vs. IGLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WCME vs. IGLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust WCM Developing World Equity ETF (WCME) and FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCME achieves a 14.93% return, which is significantly higher than IGLD's 1.69% return.


WCME

1D
-2.35%
1M
4.53%
YTD
14.93%
6M
15.02%
1Y
30.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IGLD

1D
-0.81%
1M
-1.33%
YTD
1.69%
6M
4.44%
1Y
24.53%
3Y*
23.01%
5Y*
13.02%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCME vs. IGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
WCME
First Trust WCM Developing World Equity ETF
14.93%35.19%-10.72%
IGLD
FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF
1.69%47.46%-0.73%

Correlation

The correlation between WCME and IGLD is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2024

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WCME vs. IGLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCME
WCME Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
WCME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WCME Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
WCME Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
WCME Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
WCME Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

IGLD
IGLD Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
IGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCME vs. IGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust WCM Developing World Equity ETF (WCME) and FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WCMEIGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.22

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

1.40

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.96

3.82

+3.13

WCME vs. IGLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCME Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the IGLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCME and IGLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WCMEIGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

1.06

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

0.94

+0.18

Drawdowns

WCME vs. IGLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCME drawdown since its inception was -15.64%, smaller than the maximum IGLD drawdown of -18.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCME and IGLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WCMEIGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.64%

-18.59%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.64%

-17.56%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.35%

-15.16%

+12.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.67%

-5.24%

+1.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

6.43%

-2.05%

Volatility

WCME vs. IGLD - Volatility Comparison

First Trust WCM Developing World Equity ETF (WCME) has a higher volatility of 8.11% compared to FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) at 5.12%. This indicates that WCME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WCMEIGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.11%

5.12%

+2.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.23%

21.01%

-3.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.16%

23.24%

-3.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.74%

15.17%

+4.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.74%

15.00%

+4.74%

WCME vs. IGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCME has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IGLD's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

WCME vs. IGLD - Dividend Comparison

WCME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than IGLD's 17.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
IGLD
FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF
17.92%9.91%20.81%7.85%4.45%2.24%
WCME
First Trust WCM Developing World Equity ETF
0.60%0.68%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WCME and IGLD have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WCME has higher volatility (8.11%) compared to IGLD (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCME dropped -15.64% vs IGLD's -18.59%.

On 1-year performance, WCME leads with 30.37% vs 24.53% for IGLD. On fees, IGLD is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, IGLD has been the lower-risk option at 5.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WCME has performed better with a 30.37% return vs 24.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGLD is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WCME.

IGLD has the higher dividend yield at 17.92%, compared with 0.60% for WCME.

WCME is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IGLD is Precious Metals. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WCME and 0.85% for IGLD.

WCME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WCME and IGLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer