WCME vs. GEME

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WCME (First Trust WCM Developing World Equity ETF) and GEME (Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. WCME is passively managed, while GEME is actively managed. Over the past year, WCME returned 29.03% vs 78.02% for GEME. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WCME charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GEME.

Performance

WCME vs. GEME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust WCM Developing World Equity ETF (WCME) and Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (GEME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCME achieves a 14.24% return, which is significantly lower than GEME's 37.12% return.

WCME

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: 2.08%
• YTD: 14.24%
• 6M: 14.00%
• 1Y: 29.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GEME

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: 7.83%
• YTD: 37.12%
• 6M: 43.45%
• 1Y: 78.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCME vs. GEME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WCME First Trust WCM Developing World Equity ETF	14.24%	31.45%
GEME Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF	37.12%	37.35%

Correlation

The correlation between WCME and GEME is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025	0.82

The correlation between WCME and GEME has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WCME vs. GEME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCME

WCME Risk / Return Rank: 41
WCME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
WCME Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
WCME Omega Ratio Rank: 42
WCME Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
WCME Martin Ratio Rank: 42

GEME

GEME Risk / Return Rank: 93
GEME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
GEME Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
GEME Omega Ratio Rank: 93
GEME Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
GEME Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCME vs. GEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust WCM Developing World Equity ETF (WCME) and Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (GEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WCME	GEME	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	3.69	-2.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.00	4.48	-2.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.64	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.86	5.83	-3.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.64	22.78	-16.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WCME vs. GEME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCME Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is lower than the GEME Sharpe Ratio of 3.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCME and GEME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WCME	GEME	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.45	3.69	-2.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.09	2.59	-1.50

Drawdowns

WCME vs. GEME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCME drawdown since its inception was -15.64%, smaller than the maximum GEME drawdown of -16.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCME and GEME.

Drawdown Indicators

	WCME	GEME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.64%	-16.86%	+1.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.64%	-13.46%	-2.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.93%	-2.23%	-0.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.67%	-2.30%	-1.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.38%	3.44%	+0.94%

Volatility

WCME vs. GEME - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust WCM Developing World Equity ETF (WCME) is 7.98%, while Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (GEME) has a volatility of 8.57%. This indicates that WCME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GEME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WCME	GEME	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.98%	8.57%	-0.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.23%	17.94%	-0.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.17%	21.26%	-1.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.72%	22.94%	-3.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.72%	22.94%	-3.22%

WCME vs. GEME - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCME has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GEME's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

WCME vs. GEME - Dividend Comparison

WCME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than GEME's 5.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GEME Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF	5.11%	7.01%	0.00%
WCME First Trust WCM Developing World Equity ETF	0.60%	0.68%	0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WCME and GEME in my portfolio?

WCME and GEME have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WCME or GEME?

GEME has higher volatility (8.57%) compared to WCME (7.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCME dropped -15.64% vs GEME's -16.86%.

Which ETF is better, WCME or GEME?

On 1-year performance, GEME leads with 78.02% vs 29.03% for WCME. On fees, GEME is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, WCME has been the lower-risk option at 7.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WCME or GEME?

Over the 1-year period, GEME has performed better with a 78.02% return vs 29.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WCME or GEME?

GEME is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WCME.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WCME or GEME?

GEME has the higher dividend yield at 5.11%, compared with 0.60% for WCME.

What is the main difference between WCME and GEME?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Pacific AM. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WCME and 0.75% for GEME.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GEME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.69 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.