WCEO vs. RUSC

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

WCEO (Hypatia Women CEO ETF) and RUSC (U.S. Small Cap Equity Active ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, WCEO returned 28.53% vs 39.65% for RUSC. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WCEO charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for RUSC.

Performance

WCEO vs. RUSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hypatia Women CEO ETF (WCEO) and U.S. Small Cap Equity Active ETF (RUSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCEO achieves a 13.94% return, which is significantly lower than RUSC's 22.58% return.

WCEO

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: 4.13%
• YTD: 13.94%
• 6M: 12.04%
• 1Y: 28.53%
• 3Y*: 15.50%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RUSC

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 5.00%
• YTD: 22.58%
• 6M: 19.89%
• 1Y: 39.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCEO vs. RUSC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WCEO Hypatia Women CEO ETF	13.94%	15.56%
RUSC U.S. Small Cap Equity Active ETF	22.58%	16.87%

Correlation

The correlation between WCEO and RUSC is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025	0.90

The correlation between WCEO and RUSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WCEO vs. RUSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCEO

WCEO Risk / Return Rank: 71
WCEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
WCEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
WCEO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
WCEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
WCEO Martin Ratio Rank: 76

RUSC

RUSC Risk / Return Rank: 80
RUSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
RUSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
RUSC Omega Ratio Rank: 72
RUSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
RUSC Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCEO vs. RUSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hypatia Women CEO ETF (WCEO) and U.S. Small Cap Equity Active ETF (RUSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WCEO	RUSC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	2.15	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	3.02	-0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.37	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.12	4.34	-0.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.82	15.47	-2.65

WCEO vs. RUSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the RUSC Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCEO and RUSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WCEO vs. RUSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCEO drawdown since its inception was -25.88%, which is greater than RUSC's maximum drawdown of -9.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCEO and RUSC.

Drawdown Indicators

	WCEO	RUSC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.88%	-9.18%	-16.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.96%	-9.18%	+2.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.39%	+0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.43%	-1.70%	-3.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.23%	2.57%	-0.34%

Volatility

WCEO vs. RUSC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hypatia Women CEO ETF (WCEO) is 3.74%, while U.S. Small Cap Equity Active ETF (RUSC) has a volatility of 5.93%. This indicates that WCEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RUSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WCEO	RUSC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.74%	5.93%	-2.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.44%	13.67%	-3.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.21%	18.55%	-3.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.07%	18.30%	-0.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.07%	18.30%	-0.23%

WCEO vs. RUSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCEO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than RUSC's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

WCEO vs. RUSC - Dividend Comparison

WCEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, more than RUSC's 0.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
RUSC U.S. Small Cap Equity Active ETF	0.31%	0.38%	0.00%	0.00%
WCEO Hypatia Women CEO ETF	0.56%	0.64%	0.88%	0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WCEO and RUSC in my portfolio?

WCEO and RUSC have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WCEO or RUSC?

RUSC has higher volatility (5.93%) compared to WCEO (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCEO dropped -25.88% vs RUSC's -9.18%.

Which ETF is better, WCEO or RUSC?

On 1-year performance, RUSC leads with 39.65% vs 28.53% for WCEO. On fees, RUSC is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, WCEO has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WCEO or RUSC?

Over the 1-year period, RUSC has performed better with a 39.65% return vs 28.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WCEO or RUSC?

RUSC is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for WCEO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WCEO or RUSC?

WCEO has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.31% for RUSC.

What is the main difference between WCEO and RUSC?

They also come from different issuers: Hypatia Capital and Russell. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for WCEO and 0.64% for RUSC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RUSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.