WCBR vs. TIME
WCBR (WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund) and TIME (Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. WCBR is passively managed, while TIME is actively managed. Over the past year, WCBR returned 12.83% vs 23.44% for TIME. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WCBR charges 0.45%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for TIME.
Performance
WCBR vs. TIME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WCBR achieves a 26.82% return, which is significantly higher than TIME's 9.82% return.
WCBR
- 1D
- -3.87%
- 1M
- 30.04%
- YTD
- 26.82%
- 6M
- 19.91%
- 1Y
- 12.83%
- 3Y*
- 22.02%
- 5Y*
- 9.81%
- 10Y*
- —
TIME
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 5.38%
- YTD
- 9.82%
- 6M
- 10.85%
- 1Y
- 23.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WCBR vs. TIME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund | 26.82% | -1.44% | 17.97% |
TIME Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF | 9.82% | 10.17% | 6.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between WCBR and TIME is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2024 | 0.52 |
The correlation between WCBR and TIME shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
WCBR vs. TIME - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WCBR
TIME
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
WCBR
TIME
Basic Materials
WCBR
-
TIME
Communication Services
WCBR
-
TIME
Consumer Cyclical
WCBR
-
TIME
Consumer Defensive
WCBR
-
TIME
Energy
WCBR
-
TIME
Financial Services
WCBR
-
TIME
Healthcare
WCBR
-
TIME
Industrials
WCBR
-
TIME
Real Estate
WCBR
-
TIME
-
Utilities
WCBR
-
TIME
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WCBR vs. TIME — Risk / Return Rank
WCBR
TIME
WCBR vs. TIME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) and Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF (TIME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WCBR | TIME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.31 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 1.80 | -1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.99 | 6.63 | -5.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WCBR | TIME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | 1.78 | -1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.80 | -0.59 |
Drawdowns
WCBR vs. TIME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WCBR drawdown since its inception was -52.25%, which is greater than TIME's maximum drawdown of -24.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCBR and TIME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WCBR | TIME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.25% | -24.26% | -27.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.92% | -13.09% | -16.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.56% | -0.74% | -3.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.36% | -5.60% | -14.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.03% | 3.55% | +9.48% |
Volatility
WCBR vs. TIME - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) has a higher volatility of 13.55% compared to Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF (TIME) at 3.48%. This indicates that WCBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WCBR | TIME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.55% | 3.48% | +10.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.26% | 10.14% | +17.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.16% | 13.27% | +18.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.60% | 17.62% | +15.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.59% | 17.62% | +15.97% |
WCBR vs. TIME - Expense Ratio Comparison
WCBR has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than TIME's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
WCBR vs. TIME - Dividend Comparison
WCBR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TIME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIME Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF | 9.12% | 10.02% | 15.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WCBR and TIME have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WCBR has higher volatility (13.55%) compared to TIME (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCBR dropped -52.25% vs TIME's -24.26%.
On 1-year performance, TIME leads with 23.44% vs 12.83% for WCBR. On fees, WCBR is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, TIME has been the lower-risk option at 3.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TIME has performed better with a 23.44% return vs 12.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WCBR is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for TIME.
TIME has the higher dividend yield at 9.12%, compared with 0.00% for WCBR.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Clockwise Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WCBR and 1.00% for TIME.
TIME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WCBR and TIME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer