WCBR vs. PRAY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WCBR (WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund) and PRAY (FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WCBR is a Technology Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Team8 Cybersecurity Index, while PRAY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the NONE. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WCBR returned 22.02%/yr vs 16.61%/yr for PRAY. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WCBR charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for PRAY.

Performance

WCBR vs. PRAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) and FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF (PRAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCBR achieves a 26.82% return, which is significantly higher than PRAY's 14.78% return.

WCBR

• 1D: -3.87%
• 1M: 30.04%
• YTD: 26.82%
• 6M: 19.91%
• 1Y: 12.83%
• 3Y*: 22.02%
• 5Y*: 9.81%
• 10Y*: —

PRAY

• 1D: -0.81%
• 1M: 3.83%
• YTD: 14.78%
• 6M: 14.02%
• 1Y: 21.06%
• 3Y*: 16.61%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCBR vs. PRAY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund	26.82%	-1.44%	11.42%	66.63%	-33.17%
PRAY FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF	14.78%	9.08%	13.02%	20.02%	-13.49%

Correlation

The correlation between WCBR and PRAY is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2022	0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between WCBR and PRAY has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

WCBR vs. PRAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WCBR	PRAY
Technology	100.0%	25.2%
Basic Materials	-	3.0%
Communication Services	-	8.6%
Consumer Cyclical	-	14.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.0%
Energy	-	3.8%
Financial Services	-	12.5%
Healthcare	-	7.7%
Industrials	-	15.3%
Real Estate	-	1.6%
Utilities	-	4.2%

Return for Risk

WCBR vs. PRAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCBR

WCBR Risk / Return Rank: 14
WCBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
WCBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
WCBR Omega Ratio Rank: 16
WCBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
WCBR Martin Ratio Rank: 13

PRAY

PRAY Risk / Return Rank: 51
PRAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
PRAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
PRAY Omega Ratio Rank: 47
PRAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
PRAY Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCBR vs. PRAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) and FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF (PRAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WCBR	PRAY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.40	1.67	-1.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.75	2.47	-1.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.29	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.43	2.40	-1.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.99	10.57	-9.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WCBR vs. PRAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCBR Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the PRAY Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCBR and PRAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WCBR	PRAY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40	1.67	-1.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	0.59	-0.37

Drawdowns

WCBR vs. PRAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCBR drawdown since its inception was -52.25%, which is greater than PRAY's maximum drawdown of -21.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCBR and PRAY.

Drawdown Indicators

	WCBR	PRAY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.25%	-21.40%	-30.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.92%	-8.80%	-21.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.27%	-17.13%	-13.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.56%	-0.81%	-3.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.36%	-5.43%	-14.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.03%	2.00%	+11.03%

Volatility

WCBR vs. PRAY - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) has a higher volatility of 13.55% compared to FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF (PRAY) at 4.21%. This indicates that WCBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WCBR	PRAY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.55%	4.21%	+9.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.26%	10.58%	+16.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.16%	12.70%	+19.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.60%	16.00%	+17.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.59%	16.00%	+17.59%

WCBR vs. PRAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCBR has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than PRAY's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

WCBR vs. PRAY - Dividend Comparison

WCBR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PRAY FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF	0.60%	0.69%	0.76%	0.83%	1.20%	0.00%
WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%	0.00%	0.03%	0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WCBR and PRAY in my portfolio?

WCBR and PRAY have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WCBR or PRAY?

WCBR has higher volatility (13.55%) compared to PRAY (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCBR dropped -52.25% vs PRAY's -21.40%.

Which ETF is better, WCBR or PRAY?

On 3-year performance, WCBR leads with 22.02% vs 16.61% for PRAY. On fees, WCBR is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, PRAY has been the lower-risk option at 4.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WCBR or PRAY?

Over the 3-year period, WCBR has performed better with a 22.02% return vs 16.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WCBR or PRAY?

WCBR is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for PRAY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WCBR or PRAY?

PRAY has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.00% for WCBR.

What is the main difference between WCBR and PRAY?

WCBR is categorized as Technology Equities, while PRAY is Large Cap Blend Equities. WCBR tracks WisdomTree Team8 Cybersecurity Index, while PRAY tracks NONE. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Faith Investor Services. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WCBR and 0.69% for PRAY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.