PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WCBR vs. GDMN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WCBR vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WCBR vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
WCBR
WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund
-9.67%-1.44%11.42%66.63%-41.96%4.61%
GDMN
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund
14.62%237.09%28.23%12.97%-14.62%5.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCBR achieves a -9.67% return, which is significantly lower than GDMN's 14.62% return.


WCBR

1D
0.86%
1M
1.59%
YTD
-9.67%
6M
-20.38%
1Y
-8.51%
3Y*
11.00%
5Y*
3.11%
10Y*

GDMN

1D
5.38%
1M
-24.54%
YTD
14.62%
6M
37.18%
1Y
154.40%
3Y*
68.32%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


WCBR vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both WCBR and GDMN have an expense ratio of 0.45%.


Return for Risk

WCBR vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCBR
WCBR Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
WCBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WCBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
WCBR Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
WCBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
WCBR Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

GDMN
GDMN Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GDMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDMN Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
GDMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDMN Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCBR vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WCBRGDMNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.28

2.42

-2.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.19

2.47

-2.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.37

-0.40

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.25

3.92

-4.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.63

13.31

-13.94

WCBR vs. GDMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCBR Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the GDMN Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCBR and GDMN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WCBRGDMNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

2.42

-2.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.97

-0.96

Correlation

The correlation between WCBR and GDMN is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

WCBR vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison

WCBR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%.


TTM20252024202320222021
WCBR
WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund
0.00%0.00%0.02%0.00%0.03%0.43%
GDMN
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund
2.36%2.70%9.44%7.69%1.44%0.00%

Drawdowns

WCBR vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCBR drawdown since its inception was -52.25%, roughly equal to the maximum GDMN drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCBR and GDMN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


WCBRGDMNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.25%

-52.82%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.17%

-39.03%

+10.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.85%

-24.76%

+1.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.57%

-18.46%

-2.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.29%

11.50%

-0.21%

Volatility

WCBR vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) is 10.01%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a volatility of 23.34%. This indicates that WCBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


WCBRGDMNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.01%

23.34%

-13.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.84%

54.11%

-32.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.52%

64.17%

-33.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.83%

47.24%

-14.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.99%

47.24%

-14.25%