WCBR vs. GDMN

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

WCBR (WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund) and GDMN (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - WCBR is a Technology Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Team8 Cybersecurity Index, while GDMN is a Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. WCBR is passively managed, while GDMN is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, WCBR returned 24.81%/yr vs 54.79%/yr for GDMN. Their 0.14 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.45% expense ratio.

Performance

WCBR vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCBR achieves a 38.04% return, which is significantly higher than GDMN's -21.29% return.

WCBR

• 1D: 3.28%
• 1M: 3.11%
• 6M: 45.67%
• YTD: 38.04%
• 1Y: 27.65%
• 3Y*: 24.81%
• 5Y*: 8.16%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.63%

GDMN

• 1D: 1.66%
• 1M: -4.40%
• 6M: -30.05%
• YTD: -21.29%
• 1Y: 49.41%
• 3Y*: 54.79%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 31.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	$1.47M	$2.23M	$3.42M
WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund	$2.26M	$1.99M	$1.49M

WCBR vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund	38.04%	-1.44%	11.42%	66.63%	-41.96%	2.22%
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	-21.29%	237.09%	28.23%	12.97%	-14.62%	6.93%

Correlation

The correlation between WCBR and GDMN is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.08
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021	0.14

WCBR vs. GDMN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WCBR	GDMN
Technology	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	100.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

WCBR vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WCBR

WCBR Risk / Return Rank: 30
WCBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
WCBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
WCBR Omega Ratio Rank: 32
WCBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
WCBR Martin Ratio Rank: 26

GDMN

GDMN Risk / Return Rank: 31
GDMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
GDMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
GDMN Omega Ratio Rank: 37
GDMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
GDMN Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WCBR vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WCBR	GDMN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.81	0.76	+0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.27	1.27	0.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.18	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.93	0.95	-0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.09	1.99	+0.10

WCBR vs. GDMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCBR Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is comparable to the GDMN Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCBR and GDMN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WCBR vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCBR drawdown since its inception was -52.25%, roughly equal to the maximum GDMN drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCBR and GDMN.

Drawdown Indicators

	WCBR	GDMN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.25%	-52.82%	+0.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.92%	-52.02%	+22.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.27%	-52.02%	+21.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.94%	-48.33%	+43.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.96%	-19.85%	-0.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.27%	24.95%	-11.68%

Volatility

WCBR vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) is 11.32%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a volatility of 14.93%. This indicates that WCBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WCBR	GDMN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.32%	14.93%	-3.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.53%	49.31%	-19.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.51%	65.05%	-30.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.10%	48.34%	-14.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.67%	48.34%	-14.67%

WCBR vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both WCBR and GDMN have an expense ratio of 0.45%.

Dividends

WCBR vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison

WCBR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	3.43%	2.70%	9.44%	7.69%	1.44%	0.00%
WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%	0.00%	0.03%	0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WCBR and GDMN in my portfolio?

WCBR and GDMN have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WCBR or GDMN?

GDMN has higher volatility (14.93%) compared to WCBR (11.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCBR dropped -52.25% vs GDMN's -52.82%.

Which ETF is better, WCBR or GDMN?

On 3-year performance, GDMN leads with 54.79% vs 24.81% for WCBR. Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. On volatility, WCBR has been the lower-risk option at 11.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WCBR or GDMN?

Over the 3-year period, GDMN has performed better with a 54.79% return vs 24.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WCBR or GDMN?

WCBR and GDMN have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WCBR or GDMN?

GDMN has the higher dividend yield at 3.43%, compared with 0.00% for WCBR.

What is the main difference between WCBR and GDMN?

WCBR is categorized as Technology Equities, while GDMN is Commodities.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WCBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.