PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WBSIX vs. WBGSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WBSIX vs. WBGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in William Blair Small Cap Growth Fund (WBSIX) and William Blair Growth Fund (WBGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WBSIX achieves a 19.52% return, which is significantly higher than WBGSX's 5.97% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WBSIX having a 15.39% annualized return and WBGSX not far behind at 15.12%.


WBSIX

1D
0.25%
1M
6.39%
YTD
19.52%
6M
17.13%
1Y
32.93%
3Y*
21.13%
5Y*
8.19%
10Y*
15.39%

WBGSX

1D
-0.98%
1M
0.42%
YTD
5.97%
6M
4.87%
1Y
18.37%
3Y*
16.78%
5Y*
8.37%
10Y*
15.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WBSIX vs. WBGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WBSIX
William Blair Small Cap Growth Fund
19.52%3.03%32.88%16.38%-21.46%12.64%38.87%22.53%-2.08%26.81%
WBGSX
William Blair Growth Fund
5.97%10.69%21.86%37.75%-29.75%21.71%36.12%32.11%4.88%24.19%

Correlation

The correlation between WBSIX and WBGSX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 1999

0.85

The correlation between WBSIX and WBGSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WBSIX vs. WBGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WBSIX
WBSIX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
WBSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WBSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
WBSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
WBSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
WBSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

WBGSX
WBGSX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
WBGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WBGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
WBGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
WBGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
WBGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WBSIX vs. WBGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for William Blair Small Cap Growth Fund (WBSIX) and William Blair Growth Fund (WBGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WBSIXWBGSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.20

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

1.00

+1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.68

2.82

+6.87

WBSIX vs. WBGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WBSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the WBGSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WBSIX and WBGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WBSIX vs. WBGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WBSIX drawdown since its inception was -62.35%, which is greater than WBGSX's maximum drawdown of -53.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBSIX and WBGSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WBSIXWBGSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.35%

-53.05%

-9.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.75%

-19.70%

+6.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.76%

-25.45%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.13%

-36.90%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.16%

-36.90%

-2.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.31%

+4.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.12%

-11.51%

+0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

6.94%

-3.41%

Volatility

WBSIX vs. WBGSX - Volatility Comparison

William Blair Small Cap Growth Fund (WBSIX) and William Blair Growth Fund (WBGSX) have volatilities of 6.86% and 7.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WBSIXWBGSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.86%

7.10%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.40%

13.91%

+1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.77%

17.71%

+3.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.98%

21.66%

+2.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.09%

20.63%

+2.46%

WBSIX vs. WBGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WBSIX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than WBGSX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

WBSIX vs. WBGSX - Dividend Comparison

WBSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%, less than WBGSX's 41.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WBGSX
William Blair Growth Fund
41.49%43.96%34.53%12.73%4.59%14.82%15.07%10.27%38.86%38.00%8.81%13.92%
WBSIX
William Blair Small Cap Growth Fund
6.26%7.49%20.14%1.53%3.55%17.85%9.73%2.07%12.60%16.89%5.42%8.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


WBSIX and WBGSX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WBGSX has higher volatility (7.10%) compared to WBSIX (6.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WBSIX dropped -62.35% vs WBGSX's -53.05%.

WBSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WBSIX and WBGSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer