WBSIX vs. WBGSX
WBSIX (William Blair Small Cap Growth Fund) and WBGSX (William Blair Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - WBSIX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by William Blair, while WBGSX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by William Blair. Over the past 10 years, WBSIX returned 15.39%/yr vs 15.12%/yr for WBGSX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WBSIX charges 1.25%/yr vs 1.20%/yr for WBGSX.
Performance
WBSIX vs. WBGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WBSIX achieves a 19.52% return, which is significantly higher than WBGSX's 5.97% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WBSIX having a 15.39% annualized return and WBGSX not far behind at 15.12%.
WBSIX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- 19.52%
- 6M
- 17.13%
- 1Y
- 32.93%
- 3Y*
- 21.13%
- 5Y*
- 8.19%
- 10Y*
- 15.39%
WBGSX
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 5.97%
- 6M
- 4.87%
- 1Y
- 18.37%
- 3Y*
- 16.78%
- 5Y*
- 8.37%
- 10Y*
- 15.12%
WBSIX vs. WBGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBSIX William Blair Small Cap Growth Fund | 19.52% | 3.03% | 32.88% | 16.38% | -21.46% | 12.64% | 38.87% | 22.53% | -2.08% | 26.81% |
WBGSX William Blair Growth Fund | 5.97% | 10.69% | 21.86% | 37.75% | -29.75% | 21.71% | 36.12% | 32.11% | 4.88% | 24.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between WBSIX and WBGSX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 1999 | 0.85 |
The correlation between WBSIX and WBGSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WBSIX vs. WBGSX — Risk / Return Rank
WBSIX
WBGSX
WBSIX vs. WBGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for William Blair Small Cap Growth Fund (WBSIX) and William Blair Growth Fund (WBGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WBSIX | WBGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.20 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.69 | 1.00 | +1.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.68 | 2.82 | +6.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WBSIX vs. WBGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WBSIX drawdown since its inception was -62.35%, which is greater than WBGSX's maximum drawdown of -53.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBSIX and WBGSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WBSIX | WBGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.35% | -53.05% | -9.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.75% | -19.70% | +6.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.76% | -25.45% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.13% | -36.90% | -1.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.16% | -36.90% | -2.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.31% | +4.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.12% | -11.51% | +0.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 6.94% | -3.41% |
Volatility
WBSIX vs. WBGSX - Volatility Comparison
William Blair Small Cap Growth Fund (WBSIX) and William Blair Growth Fund (WBGSX) have volatilities of 6.86% and 7.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WBSIX | WBGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.86% | 7.10% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.40% | 13.91% | +1.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.77% | 17.71% | +3.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.98% | 21.66% | +2.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.09% | 20.63% | +2.46% |
WBSIX vs. WBGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WBSIX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than WBGSX's 1.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
WBSIX vs. WBGSX - Dividend Comparison
WBSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%, less than WBGSX's 41.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBGSX William Blair Growth Fund | 41.49% | 43.96% | 34.53% | 12.73% | 4.59% | 14.82% | 15.07% | 10.27% | 38.86% | 38.00% | 8.81% | 13.92% |
WBSIX William Blair Small Cap Growth Fund | 6.26% | 7.49% | 20.14% | 1.53% | 3.55% | 17.85% | 9.73% | 2.07% | 12.60% | 16.89% | 5.42% | 8.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WBSIX and WBGSX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WBGSX has higher volatility (7.10%) compared to WBSIX (6.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WBSIX dropped -62.35% vs WBGSX's -53.05%.
WBSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WBSIX and WBGSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer