PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WBIIX vs. DCINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WBIIX vs. DCINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in William Blair Institutional International Growth Fund (WBIIX) and Dunham International Stock Fund (DCINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WBIIX achieves a 11.84% return, which is significantly lower than DCINX's 21.30% return. Over the past 10 years, WBIIX has underperformed DCINX with an annualized return of 8.48%, while DCINX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.21% annualized return.


WBIIX

1D
-1.71%
1M
-2.01%
6M
8.08%
YTD
11.84%
1Y
17.88%
3Y*
11.17%
5Y*
2.06%
10Y*
8.48%

DCINX

1D
-1.78%
1M
-2.06%
6M
15.24%
YTD
21.30%
1Y
41.86%
3Y*
25.87%
5Y*
13.47%
10Y*
12.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WBIIX vs. DCINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WBIIX
William Blair Institutional International Growth Fund
11.84%18.16%2.40%15.23%-28.39%9.30%32.69%30.75%-17.49%29.51%
DCINX
Dunham International Stock Fund
21.30%46.37%7.65%15.98%-14.67%9.70%19.86%18.14%-14.27%24.40%

Correlation

The correlation between WBIIX and DCINX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2004

0.85

The correlation between WBIIX and DCINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WBIIX vs. DCINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WBIIX
WBIIX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
WBIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WBIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
WBIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
WBIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
WBIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

DCINX
DCINX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DCINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCINX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
DCINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCINX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WBIIX vs. DCINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for William Blair Institutional International Growth Fund (WBIIX) and Dunham International Stock Fund (DCINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WBIIXDCINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.43

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

3.56

-2.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.90

13.58

-8.68

WBIIX vs. DCINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WBIIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the DCINX Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WBIIX and DCINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WBIIX vs. DCINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WBIIX drawdown since its inception was -65.13%, which is greater than DCINX's maximum drawdown of -61.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBIIX and DCINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WBIIXDCINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.13%

-61.79%

-3.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.17%

-11.91%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.06%

-13.74%

-3.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.91%

-31.18%

-9.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.91%

-37.28%

-3.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.70%

-4.58%

-1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.74%

-12.80%

-1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

3.12%

+0.49%

Volatility

WBIIX vs. DCINX - Volatility Comparison

William Blair Institutional International Growth Fund (WBIIX) and Dunham International Stock Fund (DCINX) have volatilities of 7.46% and 7.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WBIIXDCINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.46%

7.19%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.29%

15.68%

-0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.18%

17.77%

-0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.08%

15.79%

+1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.12%

16.49%

+0.63%

WBIIX vs. DCINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WBIIX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than DCINX's 2.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

WBIIX vs. DCINX - Dividend Comparison

WBIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.20%, more than DCINX's 9.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DCINX
Dunham International Stock Fund
9.02%10.95%13.87%3.45%3.53%15.49%1.36%1.54%6.92%3.92%0.00%0.00%
WBIIX
William Blair Institutional International Growth Fund
11.20%12.53%7.49%2.51%6.57%16.58%12.61%0.95%11.74%4.16%1.15%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


WBIIX and DCINX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WBIIX has higher volatility (7.46%) compared to DCINX (7.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WBIIX dropped -65.13% vs DCINX's -61.79%.

DCINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WBIIX and DCINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer