WBIG vs. GKAT
WBIG (WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF) and GKAT (Scharf Global Opportunity ETF) are both Global Equities funds. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WBIG charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for GKAT.
Performance
WBIG vs. GKAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WBIG achieves a 9.05% return, which is significantly lower than GKAT's 10.13% return.
WBIG
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 3.86%
- YTD
- 9.05%
- 6M
- 8.24%
- 1Y
- 20.44%
- 3Y*
- 6.44%
- 5Y*
- 0.69%
- 10Y*
- 3.86%
GKAT
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 4.18%
- YTD
- 10.13%
- 6M
- 13.53%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WBIG vs. GKAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WBIG WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF | 9.05% | 4.29% |
GKAT Scharf Global Opportunity ETF | 10.13% | 6.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between WBIG and GKAT is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WBIG vs. GKAT — Risk / Return Rank
WBIG
GKAT
WBIG vs. GKAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF (WBIG) and Scharf Global Opportunity ETF (GKAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WBIG | GKAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.05 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.76 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WBIG | GKAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 1.86 | -1.71 |
Drawdowns
WBIG vs. GKAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WBIG drawdown since its inception was -25.32%, which is greater than GKAT's maximum drawdown of -10.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBIG and GKAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WBIG | GKAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.32% | -10.41% | -14.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.50% | -0.59% | -3.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.92% | -2.06% | -8.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.61% | — | — |
Volatility
WBIG vs. GKAT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WBIG | GKAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.42% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.58% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.87% | 11.95% | -2.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.05% | 11.95% | +0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.55% | 11.95% | -0.40% |
WBIG vs. GKAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
WBIG has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than GKAT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
WBIG vs. GKAT - Dividend Comparison
WBIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than GKAT's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GKAT Scharf Global Opportunity ETF | 0.44% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WBIG WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF | 1.21% | 1.74% | 2.05% | 1.74% | 1.29% | 2.94% | 0.90% | 1.87% | 1.20% | 1.27% | 0.96% | 1.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WBIG and GKAT have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GKAT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GKAT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for WBIG.
WBIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.44% for GKAT.
They also come from different issuers: WBI and Scharf Investments. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for WBIG and 0.59% for GKAT.
Find the right allocation for WBIG and GKAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer