WBIF vs. FYLD
Compare and contrast key facts about WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD).
WBIF and FYLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WBIF is an actively managed fund by WBI. It was launched on Aug 27, 2014. FYLD is an actively managed fund by Cambria. It was launched on Dec 3, 2013.
Performance
WBIF vs. FYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WBIF vs. FYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF | 1.40% | 9.16% | 3.43% | 0.49% | -8.38% | 16.56% | -2.71% | 2.68% | -4.68% | 19.42% |
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 14.87% | 34.53% | 3.00% | 13.18% | -5.53% | 18.67% | 4.17% | 17.83% | -14.47% | 29.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WBIF achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than FYLD's 14.87% return. Over the past 10 years, WBIF has underperformed FYLD with an annualized return of 4.53%, while FYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.36% annualized return.
WBIF
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -4.81%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 0.39%
- 1Y
- 8.81%
- 3Y*
- 6.18%
- 5Y*
- 1.67%
- 10Y*
- 4.53%
FYLD
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -1.81%
- YTD
- 14.87%
- 6M
- 20.45%
- 1Y
- 43.76%
- 3Y*
- 19.99%
- 5Y*
- 12.16%
- 10Y*
- 11.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WBIF vs. FYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
WBIF has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WBIF vs. FYLD — Risk / Return Rank
WBIF
FYLD
WBIF vs. FYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WBIF | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.62 | 2.68 | -2.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.88 | 3.35 | -2.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.59 | -0.46 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 3.33 | -2.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.67 | 19.43 | -16.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WBIF | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 2.68 | -2.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.75 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.63 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.44 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between WBIF and FYLD is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
WBIF vs. FYLD - Dividend Comparison
WBIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than FYLD's 3.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF | 0.06% | 0.14% | 1.17% | 0.82% | 0.96% | 2.59% | 0.09% | 1.04% | 0.77% | 0.75% | 0.67% | 0.86% |
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 3.76% | 4.07% | 5.41% | 6.06% | 6.13% | 4.74% | 3.94% | 3.73% | 5.17% | 2.85% | 2.72% | 3.98% |
Drawdowns
WBIF vs. FYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WBIF drawdown since its inception was -20.29%, smaller than the maximum FYLD drawdown of -44.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBIF and FYLD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WBIF | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.29% | -44.55% | +24.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.51% | -13.05% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.29% | -25.12% | +4.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.29% | -44.55% | +24.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.81% | -1.99% | -2.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.83% | -8.94% | +1.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 2.29% | +1.17% |
Volatility
WBIF vs. FYLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) is 3.36%, while Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) has a volatility of 4.82%. This indicates that WBIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WBIF | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.36% | 4.82% | -1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.03% | 9.10% | -0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.34% | 16.41% | -2.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.82% | 16.30% | -3.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.24% | 18.09% | -5.85% |