PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WBIF vs. DIVD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WBIF vs. DIVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) and Altrius Global Dividend ETF (DIVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WBIF vs. DIVD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
WBIF
WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF
1.40%9.16%3.43%0.49%-0.69%
DIVD
Altrius Global Dividend ETF
7.40%26.18%2.52%14.27%18.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WBIF achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than DIVD's 7.40% return.


WBIF

1D
0.47%
1M
-4.81%
YTD
1.40%
6M
0.39%
1Y
8.81%
3Y*
6.18%
5Y*
1.67%
10Y*
4.53%

DIVD

1D
0.32%
1M
-2.47%
YTD
7.40%
6M
12.03%
1Y
23.19%
3Y*
15.33%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


WBIF vs. DIVD - Expense Ratio Comparison

WBIF has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVD's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

WBIF vs. DIVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WBIF
WBIF Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
WBIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WBIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
WBIF Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
WBIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
WBIF Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVD
DIVD Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DIVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVD Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVD Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WBIF vs. DIVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) and Altrius Global Dividend ETF (DIVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WBIFDIVDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.62

1.52

-0.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.88

2.13

-1.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.32

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

1.92

-1.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.67

9.38

-6.71

WBIF vs. DIVD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WBIF Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the DIVD Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WBIF and DIVD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WBIFDIVDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

1.52

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

1.49

-1.25

Correlation

The correlation between WBIF and DIVD is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

WBIF vs. DIVD - Dividend Comparison

WBIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than DIVD's 2.86% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WBIF
WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF
0.06%0.14%1.17%0.82%0.96%2.59%0.09%1.04%0.77%0.75%0.67%0.86%
DIVD
Altrius Global Dividend ETF
2.86%2.86%3.39%2.96%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

WBIF vs. DIVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WBIF drawdown since its inception was -20.29%, which is greater than DIVD's maximum drawdown of -13.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBIF and DIVD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


WBIFDIVDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.29%

-13.88%

-6.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.51%

-11.88%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.81%

-3.23%

-1.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.83%

-2.29%

-5.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

2.43%

+1.03%

Volatility

WBIF vs. DIVD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) is 3.36%, while Altrius Global Dividend ETF (DIVD) has a volatility of 3.94%. This indicates that WBIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


WBIFDIVDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

3.94%

-0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.03%

8.31%

+0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.34%

15.31%

-0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.82%

13.36%

-0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.24%

13.36%

-1.12%