PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WBGSX vs. WBSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WBGSX vs. WBSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in William Blair Growth Fund (WBGSX) and William Blair Small Cap Growth Fund (WBSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WBGSX achieves a 5.97% return, which is significantly lower than WBSIX's 19.52% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WBGSX having a 15.12% annualized return and WBSIX not far ahead at 15.39%.


WBGSX

1D
-0.98%
1M
0.42%
YTD
5.97%
6M
4.87%
1Y
18.37%
3Y*
16.78%
5Y*
8.37%
10Y*
15.12%

WBSIX

1D
0.25%
1M
6.39%
YTD
19.52%
6M
17.13%
1Y
32.93%
3Y*
21.13%
5Y*
8.19%
10Y*
15.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WBGSX vs. WBSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WBGSX
William Blair Growth Fund
5.97%10.69%21.86%37.75%-29.75%21.71%36.12%32.11%4.88%24.19%
WBSIX
William Blair Small Cap Growth Fund
19.52%3.03%32.88%16.38%-21.46%12.64%38.87%22.53%-2.08%26.81%

Correlation

The correlation between WBGSX and WBSIX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 1999

0.85

The correlation between WBGSX and WBSIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WBGSX vs. WBSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WBGSX
WBGSX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
WBGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WBGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
WBGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
WBGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
WBGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

WBSIX
WBSIX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
WBSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WBSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
WBSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
WBSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
WBSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WBGSX vs. WBSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for William Blair Growth Fund (WBGSX) and William Blair Small Cap Growth Fund (WBSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WBGSXWBSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.28

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

2.69

-1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.82

9.68

-6.87

WBGSX vs. WBSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WBGSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the WBSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WBGSX and WBSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WBGSX vs. WBSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WBGSX drawdown since its inception was -53.05%, smaller than the maximum WBSIX drawdown of -62.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBGSX and WBSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WBGSXWBSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.05%

-62.35%

+9.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.70%

-12.75%

-6.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.45%

-24.76%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.90%

-38.13%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.90%

-39.16%

+2.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.31%

0.00%

-4.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.51%

-11.12%

-0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.94%

3.53%

+3.41%

Volatility

WBGSX vs. WBSIX - Volatility Comparison

William Blair Growth Fund (WBGSX) and William Blair Small Cap Growth Fund (WBSIX) have volatilities of 7.10% and 6.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WBGSXWBSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.10%

6.86%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.91%

15.40%

-1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.71%

20.77%

-3.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.66%

23.98%

-2.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.63%

23.09%

-2.46%

WBGSX vs. WBSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WBGSX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is lower than WBSIX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

WBGSX vs. WBSIX - Dividend Comparison

WBGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 41.49%, more than WBSIX's 6.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WBGSX
William Blair Growth Fund
41.49%43.96%34.53%12.73%4.59%14.82%15.07%10.27%38.86%38.00%8.81%13.92%
WBSIX
William Blair Small Cap Growth Fund
6.26%7.49%20.14%1.53%3.55%17.85%9.73%2.07%12.60%16.89%5.42%8.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


WBGSX and WBSIX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WBGSX has higher volatility (7.10%) compared to WBSIX (6.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WBGSX dropped -53.05% vs WBSIX's -62.35%.

WBSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WBGSX and WBSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer