WB vs. PCY

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

WB (Weibo Corporation) is a stock, while PCY (Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF) is Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the DB Emerging Market USD Liquid Balanced Index. Over the past 10 years, WB returned -10.38%/yr vs 2.13%/yr for PCY. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

WB vs. PCY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Weibo Corporation (WB) and Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF (PCY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WB achieves a -17.78% return, which is significantly lower than PCY's 1.55% return. Over the past 10 years, WB has underperformed PCY with an annualized return of -10.38%, while PCY has yielded a comparatively higher 2.13% annualized return.

WB

• 1D: 1.42%
• 1M: 4.67%
• 6M: -23.68%
• YTD: -17.78%
• 1Y: -17.46%
• 3Y*: -9.46%
• 5Y*: -28.86%
• 10Y*: -10.38%

PCY

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -1.60%
• 6M: 1.46%
• YTD: 1.55%
• 1Y: 12.00%
• 3Y*: 9.57%
• 5Y*: 1.12%
• 10Y*: 2.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WB vs. PCY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WB Weibo Corporation	-17.78%	19.50%	-3.98%	-39.08%	-38.28%	-24.42%	-11.56%	-20.67%	-43.52%	154.83%
PCY Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF	1.55%	16.31%	2.55%	18.48%	-24.47%	-4.30%	2.29%	17.66%	-6.16%	9.71%

Correlation

The correlation between WB and PCY is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2014	0.22

Return for Risk

WB vs. PCY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WB

WB Risk / Return Rank: 24
WB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
WB Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
WB Omega Ratio Rank: 20
WB Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
WB Martin Ratio Rank: 29

PCY

PCY Risk / Return Rank: 59
PCY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
PCY Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
PCY Omega Ratio Rank: 62
PCY Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
PCY Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WB vs. PCY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Weibo Corporation (WB) and Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF (PCY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WB	PCY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.54	1.65	-2.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.62	2.36	-2.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.30	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.44	2.04	-2.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.76	8.20	-8.96

WB vs. PCY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WB Sharpe Ratio is -0.54, which is lower than the PCY Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WB and PCY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WB vs. PCY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WB drawdown since its inception was -94.02%, which is greater than PCY's maximum drawdown of -49.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WB and PCY.

Drawdown Indicators

	WB	PCY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.02%	-49.13%	-44.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.93%	-5.91%	-34.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-50.16%	-11.52%	-38.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-86.48%	-37.17%	-49.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-94.02%	-37.78%	-56.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-92.14%	-1.78%	-90.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.16%	-6.93%	-51.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.05%	1.47%	+21.58%

Volatility

WB vs. PCY - Volatility Comparison

Weibo Corporation (WB) has a higher volatility of 6.25% compared to Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF (PCY) at 1.70%. This indicates that WB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WB	PCY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.25%	1.70%	+4.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.36%	6.06%	+13.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.53%	7.32%	+25.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.28%	13.18%	+38.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.16%	12.94%	+38.22%

Dividends

WB vs. PCY - Dividend Comparison

WB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.77%, more than PCY's 5.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PCY Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF	5.91%	5.93%	6.65%	6.48%	6.81%	4.80%	4.45%	4.78%	4.93%	4.80%	5.19%	5.46%
WB Weibo Corporation	7.77%	8.02%	8.59%	7.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WB and PCY in my portfolio?

WB and PCY have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WB or PCY?

WB has higher volatility (6.25%) compared to PCY (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WB dropped -94.02% vs PCY's -49.13%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PCY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.