PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WB vs. IYW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WB vs. IYW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Weibo Corporation (WB) and iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WB vs. IYW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WB
Weibo Corporation
-14.19%19.50%-3.98%-39.08%-38.28%-24.42%-11.56%-20.67%-43.52%154.83%
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
-7.61%25.38%30.25%65.44%-34.83%35.44%47.45%46.64%-0.93%36.60%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WB achieves a -14.19% return, which is significantly lower than IYW's -7.61% return. Over the past 10 years, WB has underperformed IYW with an annualized return of -4.40%, while IYW has yielded a comparatively higher 21.74% annualized return.


WB

1D
0.23%
1M
-10.96%
YTD
-14.19%
6M
-30.06%
1Y
3.63%
3Y*
-17.00%
5Y*
-25.51%
10Y*
-4.40%

IYW

1D
1.65%
1M
-3.50%
YTD
-7.61%
6M
-6.42%
1Y
30.19%
3Y*
26.02%
5Y*
15.85%
10Y*
21.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WB vs. IYW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WB
WB Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
WB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
WB Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
WB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
WB Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

IYW
IYW Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
IYW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYW Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
IYW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYW Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WB vs. IYW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Weibo Corporation (WB) and iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WBIYWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.10

1.13

-1.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.43

1.73

-1.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.24

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.10

1.77

-1.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.23

5.68

-5.45

WB vs. IYW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WB Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the IYW Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WB and IYW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WBIYWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

1.13

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.50

0.62

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.09

0.87

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

0.30

-0.39

Correlation

The correlation between WB and IYW is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

WB vs. IYW - Dividend Comparison

WB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.35%, more than IYW's 0.15% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WB
Weibo Corporation
9.35%8.02%8.59%7.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
0.15%0.14%0.21%0.34%0.50%0.31%0.56%0.72%0.92%0.82%1.14%1.12%

Drawdowns

WB vs. IYW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WB drawdown since its inception was -94.02%, which is greater than IYW's maximum drawdown of -81.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WB and IYW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


WBIYWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.02%

-81.90%

-12.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.20%

-17.81%

-15.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.67%

-39.44%

-47.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.02%

-39.44%

-54.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.79%

-12.65%

-79.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.37%

-34.87%

-22.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.74%

5.55%

+9.19%

Volatility

WB vs. IYW - Volatility Comparison

Weibo Corporation (WB) has a higher volatility of 12.17% compared to iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) at 8.23%. This indicates that WB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


WBIYWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.17%

8.23%

+3.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.01%

15.99%

+6.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.89%

26.92%

+9.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.65%

25.78%

+25.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.86%

24.98%

+26.88%