WB vs. LAMR
Compare and contrast key facts about Weibo Corporation (WB) and Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) (LAMR).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WB or LAMR.
Key characteristics
| WB | LAMR | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -17.55% | 23.70% |
| 1Y Return | -26.06% | 38.29% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -39.88% | 7.81% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -26.15% | 13.76% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -6.37% | 14.44% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.43 | 1.79 |
| Sortino Ratio | -0.33 | 2.35 |
| Omega Ratio | 0.96 | 1.32 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.24 | 2.74 |
| Martin Ratio | -0.90 | 11.65 |
| Ulcer Index | 24.71% | 3.25% |
| Daily Std Dev | 51.67% | 21.18% |
| Max Drawdown | -94.02% | -91.85% |
| Current Drawdown | -93.13% | -7.94% |
Fundamentals
| WB | LAMR | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.11B | $13.31B |
| EPS | $1.29 | $4.96 |
| PE Ratio | 6.41 | 26.00 |
| PEG Ratio | 4.85 | 7.43 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $1.30B | $2.18B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $1.02B | $1.42B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $397.19M | $1.09B |
Correlation
The correlation between WB and LAMR is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
WB vs. LAMR - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, WB achieves a -17.55% return, which is significantly lower than LAMR's 23.70% return. Over the past 10 years, WB has underperformed LAMR with an annualized return of -6.37%, while LAMR has yielded a comparatively higher 14.44% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WB vs. LAMR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Weibo Corporation (WB) and Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) (LAMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WB vs. LAMR - Dividend Comparison
WB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.00%, more than LAMR's 4.13% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WB Weibo Corporation | 10.00% | 7.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LAMR Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) | 4.13% | 4.70% | 5.30% | 3.30% | 3.00% | 4.30% | 5.28% | 4.47% | 4.49% | 4.58% | 4.66% |
Drawdowns
WB vs. LAMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WB drawdown since its inception was -94.02%, roughly equal to the maximum LAMR drawdown of -91.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WB and LAMR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WB vs. LAMR - Volatility Comparison
Weibo Corporation (WB) has a higher volatility of 13.95% compared to Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) (LAMR) at 5.88%. This indicates that WB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LAMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
WB vs. LAMR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Weibo Corporation and Lamar Advertising Company (REIT). You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities