WB vs. LAMR
WB (Weibo Corporation) and LAMR (Lamar Advertising Company (REIT)) are both stocks. WB operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while LAMR operates in REIT - Specialty (Real Estate). Over the past 10 years, WB returned -8.71%/yr vs 14.00%/yr for LAMR. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WB vs. LAMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WB achieves a -17.15% return, which is significantly lower than LAMR's 19.60% return. Over the past 10 years, WB has underperformed LAMR with an annualized return of -8.71%, while LAMR has yielded a comparatively higher 14.00% annualized return.
WB
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- -5.27%
- YTD
- -17.15%
- 6M
- -18.03%
- 1Y
- -7.77%
- 3Y*
- -8.62%
- 5Y*
- -25.34%
- 10Y*
- -8.71%
LAMR
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 7.21%
- YTD
- 19.60%
- 6M
- 16.14%
- 1Y
- 29.87%
- 3Y*
- 22.94%
- 5Y*
- 13.14%
- 10Y*
- 14.00%
WB vs. LAMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WB Weibo Corporation | -17.15% | 19.50% | -3.98% | -39.08% | -38.28% | -24.42% | -11.56% | -20.67% | -43.52% | 154.83% |
LAMR Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) | 19.60% | 9.73% | 19.98% | 18.56% | -18.04% | 51.29% | -3.19% | 35.32% | -1.92% | 15.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between WB and LAMR is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2014 | 0.20 |
Fundamentals
WB:
$2.14B
LAMR:
$15.18B
WB:
$1.44
LAMR:
$5.42
WB:
5.50
LAMR:
27.61
WB:
0.09
LAMR:
1.80
WB:
1.16
LAMR:
6.63
WB:
0.55
LAMR:
15.46
WB:
$1.78B
LAMR:
$2.29B
WB:
$1.33B
LAMR:
$541.09M
WB:
$445.88M
LAMR:
$1.02B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WB vs. LAMR — Risk / Return Rank
WB
LAMR
WB vs. LAMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Weibo Corporation (WB) and Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) (LAMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WB | LAMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.26 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | 2.99 | -3.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.40 | 8.17 | -8.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WB | LAMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 | 1.35 | -1.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.49 | 0.49 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.17 | 0.41 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | 0.21 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
WB vs. LAMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WB drawdown since its inception was -94.02%, roughly equal to the maximum LAMR drawdown of -91.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WB and LAMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WB | LAMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.02% | -91.85% | -2.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.59% | -10.04% | -24.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.16% | -23.86% | -26.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -86.67% | -30.09% | -56.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.02% | -65.79% | -28.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.08% | -5.28% | -86.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.85% | -26.41% | -31.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.30% | 3.67% | +15.63% |
Volatility
WB vs. LAMR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Weibo Corporation (WB) is 8.38%, while Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) (LAMR) has a volatility of 10.47%. This indicates that WB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LAMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WB | LAMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.38% | 10.47% | -2.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.63% | 15.40% | +5.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.55% | 22.25% | +11.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.45% | 26.74% | +24.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.42% | 34.66% | +16.76% |
Dividends
WB vs. LAMR - Dividend Comparison
WB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.71%, more than LAMR's 4.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAMR Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) | 4.35% | 5.10% | 4.64% | 4.70% | 5.30% | 3.30% | 3.00% | 4.30% | 5.28% | 4.47% | 4.49% | 4.58% |
WB Weibo Corporation | 7.71% | 8.02% | 8.59% | 7.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
WB vs. LAMR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Weibo Corporation and Lamar Advertising Company (REIT). You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WB vs. LAMR - Profitability Comparison
WB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Weibo Corporation reported a gross profit of 303.58M and revenue of 421.33M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.1%.
LAMR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 528.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
WB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Weibo Corporation reported an operating income of 110.92M and revenue of 421.33M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.3%.
LAMR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) reported an operating income of 146.06M and revenue of 528.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.
WB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Weibo Corporation reported a net income of 34.72M and revenue of 421.33M, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.
LAMR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) reported a net income of 101.29M and revenue of 528.00M, resulting in a net margin of 19.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WB and LAMR have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LAMR has higher volatility (10.47%) compared to WB (8.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WB dropped -94.02% vs LAMR's -91.85%.
LAMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WB and LAMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer