PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WB vs. PAGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WB vs. PAGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Weibo Corporation (WB) and PagSeguro Digital Ltd. (PAGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WB achieves a -23.64% return, which is significantly lower than PAGS's -5.89% return.


WB

1D
-0.41%
1M
-8.99%
YTD
-23.64%
6M
-22.58%
1Y
-20.45%
3Y*
-10.43%
5Y*
-27.90%
10Y*
-9.27%

PAGS

1D
0.11%
1M
-4.05%
YTD
-5.89%
6M
-6.95%
1Y
-6.42%
3Y*
-2.06%
5Y*
-30.02%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WB vs. PAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
WB
Weibo Corporation
-23.64%19.50%-3.98%-39.08%-38.28%-24.42%-11.56%-20.67%-55.64%
PAGS
PagSeguro Digital Ltd.
-5.89%60.75%-49.80%42.68%-66.67%-53.90%66.51%82.38%-33.58%

Correlation

The correlation between WB and PAGS is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2018

0.33

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WB:

$1.97B

PAGS:

$2.48B

EPS

WB:

$1.44

PAGS:

R$7.31

PE Ratio

WB:

5.07

PAGS:

6.22

PEG Ratio

WB:

0.08

PAGS:

0.32

PS Ratio

WB:

1.07

PAGS:

0.67

PB Ratio

WB:

0.51

PAGS:

0.90

Total Revenue (TTM)

WB:

$1.78B

PAGS:

R$19.80B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WB:

$1.33B

PAGS:

R$10.13B

EBITDA (TTM)

WB:

$445.88M

PAGS:

R$9.32B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WB vs. PAGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WB
WB Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
WB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
WB Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
WB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
WB Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

PAGS
PAGS Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WB vs. PAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Weibo Corporation (WB) and PagSeguro Digital Ltd. (PAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WBPAGSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.01

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.52

-0.24

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.97

-0.49

-0.48

WB vs. PAGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WB Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the PAGS Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WB and PAGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WB vs. PAGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WB drawdown since its inception was -94.02%, roughly equal to the maximum PAGS drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WB and PAGS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WBPAGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.02%

-90.00%

-4.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.18%

-27.21%

-11.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.16%

-57.60%

+7.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.67%

-89.84%

+3.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.70%

-84.71%

-7.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.99%

-55.57%

-2.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.18%

13.65%

+7.53%

Volatility

WB vs. PAGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Weibo Corporation (WB) is 5.05%, while PagSeguro Digital Ltd. (PAGS) has a volatility of 9.01%. This indicates that WB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WBPAGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.05%

9.01%

-3.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.38%

33.26%

-12.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.25%

46.84%

-13.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.40%

61.40%

-10.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.31%

60.98%

-9.67%

Dividends

WB vs. PAGS - Dividend Comparison

WB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.37%, more than PAGS's 7.07% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
PAGS
PagSeguro Digital Ltd.
7.07%3.94%0.00%0.00%
WB
Weibo Corporation
8.37%8.02%8.59%7.76%

Financials

WB vs. PAGS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Weibo Corporation and PagSeguro Digital Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
421.33M
4.69B
(WB) Total Revenue
(PAGS) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. WB values in USD, PAGS values in BRL

WB vs. PAGS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Weibo Corporation and PagSeguro Digital Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
72.1%
51.2%
Portfolio components
WB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Weibo Corporation reported a gross profit of 303.58M and revenue of 421.33M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.1%.

PAGS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PagSeguro Digital Ltd. reported a gross profit of 2.40B and revenue of 4.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.2%.

WB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Weibo Corporation reported an operating income of 110.92M and revenue of 421.33M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.3%.

PAGS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PagSeguro Digital Ltd. reported an operating income of 1.75B and revenue of 4.69B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.3%.

WB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Weibo Corporation reported a net income of 34.72M and revenue of 421.33M, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.

PAGS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PagSeguro Digital Ltd. reported a net income of 535.32M and revenue of 4.69B, resulting in a net margin of 11.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WB and PAGS have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAGS has higher volatility (9.01%) compared to WB (5.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WB dropped -94.02% vs PAGS's -90.00%.

PAGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.14 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WB and PAGS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer