WATL.L vs. MWRD.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WATL.L (Lyxor MSCI Water ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF Dist) and MWRD.L (Amundi Index MSCI World) are both exchange-traded funds - WATL.L is a Water Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Water TR, while MWRD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WATL.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for MWRD.L.

Performance

WATL.L vs. MWRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI Water ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF Dist (WATL.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

WATL.L

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -1.73%
• YTD: -0.73%
• 6M: -1.98%
• 1Y: 0.41%
• 3Y*: 7.21%
• 5Y*: 5.88%
• 10Y*: 9.23%

MWRD.L

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WATL.L vs. MWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WATL.L Lyxor MSCI Water ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF Dist	-0.73%	6.48%	7.33%	16.26%	-11.97%	25.45%	13.28%	32.02%	-12.80%	6.73%
MWRD.L Amundi Index MSCI World	0.00%	0.00%	-1.27%	17.50%	-9.18%	24.39%	11.85%	23.29%	-4.10%	6.52%

Correlation

The correlation between WATL.L and MWRD.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2017	0.57

The correlation between WATL.L and MWRD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (3 years) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WATL.L vs. MWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WATL.L	MWRD.L
Industrials	76.6%	10.6%
Utilities	21.6%	2.4%
Technology	1.2%	24.7%
Basic Materials	0.6%	3.8%
Communication Services	0.0%	7.5%
Consumer Cyclical	0.0%	10.5%
Financial Services	0.0%	14.7%
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	6.7%
Energy	0.0%	4.4%
Healthcare	0.0%	12.4%
Real Estate	-	2.4%

Return for Risk

WATL.L vs. MWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WATL.L

WATL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9
WATL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
WATL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
WATL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9
WATL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
WATL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WATL.L vs. MWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Water ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF Dist (WATL.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WATL.L	MWRD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.04	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.13	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.04	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.09	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WATL.L	MWRD.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.93	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	WATL.L	MWRD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.45%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.48%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.15%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.68%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.47%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WATL.L	MWRD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.51%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.95%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.22%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.12%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.75%	—	—

WATL.L vs. MWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WATL.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MWRD.L's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

WATL.L vs. MWRD.L - Dividend Comparison

WATL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, while MWRD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MWRD.L Amundi Index MSCI World	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WATL.L Lyxor MSCI Water ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF Dist	1.09%	1.08%	0.77%	0.84%	0.42%	0.63%	1.22%	1.59%	2.06%	1.60%	2.21%	2.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WATL.L and MWRD.L in my portfolio?

WATL.L and MWRD.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WATL.L or MWRD.L?

On fees, MWRD.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WATL.L or MWRD.L?

MWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for WATL.L.

What is the main difference between WATL.L and MWRD.L?

WATL.L is categorized as Water Equities, while MWRD.L is Global Equities. WATL.L tracks S&P Global Water TR, while MWRD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for WATL.L and 0.08% for MWRD.L.