PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WASMX vs. WSBFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WASMX vs. WSBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boston Trust Walden SMID Cap Fund (WASMX) and Boston Trust Walden Balanced Fund (WSBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WASMX achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly lower than WSBFX's 5.56% return. Over the past 10 years, WASMX has outperformed WSBFX with an annualized return of 9.86%, while WSBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.63% annualized return.


WASMX

1D
0.08%
1M
1.86%
YTD
1.27%
6M
0.98%
1Y
4.25%
3Y*
8.72%
5Y*
4.48%
10Y*
9.86%

WSBFX

1D
-0.29%
1M
2.03%
YTD
5.56%
6M
5.09%
1Y
17.47%
3Y*
10.25%
5Y*
5.81%
10Y*
8.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WASMX vs. WSBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WASMX
Boston Trust Walden SMID Cap Fund
1.27%0.31%10.39%16.40%-14.57%30.04%9.22%32.50%-5.60%14.91%
WSBFX
Boston Trust Walden Balanced Fund
5.56%10.63%6.86%12.21%-13.64%19.35%8.81%24.56%-1.90%13.98%

Correlation

The correlation between WASMX and WSBFX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2012

0.86

The correlation between WASMX and WSBFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WASMX vs. WSBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WASMX
WASMX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
WASMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WASMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
WASMX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
WASMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
WASMX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

WSBFX
WSBFX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
WSBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WSBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
WSBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
WSBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
WSBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WASMX vs. WSBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Trust Walden SMID Cap Fund (WASMX) and Boston Trust Walden Balanced Fund (WSBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WASMXWSBFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.42

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

2.81

-2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.97

12.89

-11.91

WASMX vs. WSBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WASMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the WSBFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WASMX and WSBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WASMXWSBFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

2.30

-2.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.49

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.70

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.53

+0.06

Drawdowns

WASMX vs. WSBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WASMX drawdown since its inception was -37.74%, which is greater than WSBFX's maximum drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WASMX and WSBFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WASMXWSBFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.74%

-32.01%

-5.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.38%

-6.31%

-5.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.52%

-11.46%

-9.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.07%

-19.94%

-3.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.74%

-24.21%

-13.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.31%

-0.29%

-6.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.22%

-4.52%

-0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.06%

1.37%

+2.69%

Volatility

WASMX vs. WSBFX - Volatility Comparison

Boston Trust Walden SMID Cap Fund (WASMX) has a higher volatility of 2.97% compared to Boston Trust Walden Balanced Fund (WSBFX) at 1.81%. This indicates that WASMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WSBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WASMXWSBFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

1.81%

+1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.12%

5.81%

+3.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.56%

7.70%

+5.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.16%

11.93%

+5.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.60%

12.29%

+6.31%

WASMX vs. WSBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both WASMX and WSBFX have an expense ratio of 1.00%.


Dividends

WASMX vs. WSBFX - Dividend Comparison

WASMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than WSBFX's 7.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WASMX
Boston Trust Walden SMID Cap Fund
1.63%1.65%1.67%0.52%4.90%4.75%1.86%9.96%4.40%0.52%5.41%7.06%
WSBFX
Boston Trust Walden Balanced Fund
7.55%7.97%4.75%7.68%3.66%3.51%3.42%2.30%2.19%1.02%3.06%7.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


WASMX and WSBFX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WASMX has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to WSBFX (1.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WASMX dropped -37.74% vs WSBFX's -32.01%.

WSBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WASMX and WSBFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer