PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WAR vs. WDAF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WAR vs. WDAF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF (WAR) and WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund (WDAF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


WAR

1D
-1.92%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WDAF

1D
-1.56%
1M
-13.31%
YTD
11.85%
6M
16.15%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAR vs. WDAF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WAR and WDAF is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026

-0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WAR vs. WDAF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF (WAR) and WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund (WDAF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WAR vs. WDAF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WARWDAFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

5.18

0.15

+5.03

Drawdowns

WAR vs. WDAF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAR drawdown since its inception was -1.92%, smaller than the maximum WDAF drawdown of -18.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAR and WDAF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WARWDAFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.92%

-18.21%

+16.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.92%

-16.06%

+14.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.88%

-6.09%

+5.21%

Volatility

WAR vs. WDAF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WARWDAFDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.90%

32.10%

+10.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.90%

32.10%

+10.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.90%

32.10%

+10.80%

WAR vs. WDAF - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than WDAF's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

WAR vs. WDAF - Dividend Comparison

WAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WDAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WAR and WDAF have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WDAF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WDAF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for WAR.

WDAF has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.00% for WAR.

They also come from different issuers: US Global and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for WAR and 0.45% for WDAF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WAR and WDAF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer