PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WAR vs. WDAF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WAR vs. WDAF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF (WAR) and WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund (WDAF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


WAR

1D
-4.30%
1M
-7.86%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WDAF

1D
-2.42%
1M
-7.27%
6M
-9.73%
YTD
4.66%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAR vs. WDAF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WAR and WDAF is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WAR vs. WDAF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF (WAR) and WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund (WDAF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WAR vs. WDAF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WAR vs. WDAF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAR drawdown since its inception was -15.43%, smaller than the maximum WDAF drawdown of -21.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAR and WDAF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WARWDAFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.43%

-21.46%

+6.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.43%

-21.46%

+6.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.29%

-7.46%

+0.17%

Volatility

WAR vs. WDAF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WARWDAFDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.13%

33.08%

+16.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.13%

33.08%

+16.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.13%

33.08%

+16.05%

WAR vs. WDAF - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than WDAF's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

WAR vs. WDAF - Dividend Comparison

WAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WDAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WAR and WDAF have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WDAF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WDAF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for WAR.

WDAF has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for WAR.

They also come from different issuers: US Global and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for WAR and 0.45% for WDAF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WAR and WDAF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer