PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WAR vs. ARMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WAR vs. ARMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF (WAR) and HANetf Future of European Defence Screened UCITS ETF (ARMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WAR is traded in USD, while ARMY is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ARMY values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


WAR

1D
-1.92%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARMY

1D
-2.73%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAR vs. ARMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WAR and ARMY is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026

0.60

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WAR vs. ARMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF (WAR) and HANetf Future of European Defence Screened UCITS ETF (ARMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WAR vs. ARMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WARARMYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

5.18

-0.31

+5.49

Drawdowns

WAR vs. ARMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAR drawdown since its inception was -1.92%, smaller than the maximum ARMY drawdown of -14.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAR and ARMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WARARMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.92%

-14.11%

+12.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.92%

-9.85%

+7.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.88%

-5.71%

+4.83%

Volatility

WAR vs. ARMY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WARARMYDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.90%

34.74%

+8.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.90%

34.74%

+8.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.90%

34.74%

+8.16%

WAR vs. ARMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMY's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

WAR vs. ARMY - Dividend Comparison

Neither WAR nor ARMY has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WAR and ARMY have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ARMY is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ARMY is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for WAR.

WAR and ARMY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: US Global and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for WAR and 0.39% for ARMY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WAR and ARMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer