WANT vs. XLP
WANT (Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares) and XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WANT is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index (-300%), while XLP is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WANT returned -8.83%/yr vs 6.68%/yr for XLP. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WANT charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLP.
Performance
WANT vs. XLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WANT achieves a -21.36% return, which is significantly lower than XLP's 9.13% return.
WANT
- 1D
- -3.36%
- 1M
- -14.54%
- YTD
- -21.36%
- 6M
- -26.83%
- 1Y
- -0.82%
- 3Y*
- 9.94%
- 5Y*
- -8.83%
- 10Y*
- —
XLP
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- -0.59%
- YTD
- 9.13%
- 6M
- 9.37%
- 1Y
- 5.70%
- 3Y*
- 7.18%
- 5Y*
- 6.68%
- 10Y*
- 7.51%
WANT vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WANT Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares | -21.36% | -6.94% | 60.52% | 114.43% | -83.03% | 84.81% | 45.26% | 90.07% | -24.44% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 9.13% | 1.52% | 12.20% | -0.82% | -0.81% | 17.20% | 10.11% | 27.43% | -8.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between WANT and XLP is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2018 | 0.41 |
Over the past year, the correlation between WANT and XLP has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
WANT vs. XLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WANT
XLP
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
WANT
XLP
Communication Services
WANT
XLP
-
Technology
WANT
XLP
-
Industrials
WANT
XLP
-
Basic Materials
WANT
-
XLP
-
Consumer Defensive
WANT
-
XLP
Energy
WANT
-
XLP
-
Financial Services
WANT
-
XLP
-
Healthcare
WANT
-
XLP
-
Real Estate
WANT
-
XLP
-
Utilities
WANT
-
XLP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WANT vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank
WANT
XLP
WANT vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WANT | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.08 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 0.59 | -0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.05 | 1.12 | -1.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WANT vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WANT drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, which is greater than XLP's maximum drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WANT and XLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WANT | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.89% | -35.90% | -49.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.27% | -9.69% | -31.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.53% | -12.39% | -51.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.89% | -16.30% | -69.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.10% | -5.82% | -56.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.16% | -7.06% | -36.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.14% | 5.09% | +11.05% |
Volatility
WANT vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) has a higher volatility of 19.12% compared to State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) at 5.13%. This indicates that WANT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WANT | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.12% | 5.13% | +13.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.03% | 10.52% | +30.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.06% | 13.13% | +41.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.98% | 13.36% | +57.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.48% | 14.77% | +56.71% |
WANT vs. XLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
WANT has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than XLP's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
WANT vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison
WANT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than XLP's 2.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WANT Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares | 0.68% | 0.65% | 0.61% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.62% | 2.75% | 2.77% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 2.28% | 2.50% | 2.57% | 3.04% | 2.62% | 2.53% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WANT and XLP have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WANT has higher volatility (19.12%) compared to XLP (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WANT dropped -85.89% vs XLP's -35.90%.
On 5-year performance, XLP leads with 6.68% vs -8.83% for WANT. On fees, XLP is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLP has been the lower-risk option at 5.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XLP has performed better with a 6.68% return vs -8.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLP is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for WANT.
XLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.68% for WANT.
WANT is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XLP is Consumer Staples Equities. WANT tracks S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index (-300%), while XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for WANT and 0.08% for XLP.
XLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WANT and XLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer