PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WANT vs. XLP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WANT vs. XLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WANT achieves a -14.08% return, which is significantly lower than XLP's 6.36% return.


WANT

1D
-2.18%
1M
-3.95%
YTD
-14.08%
6M
-14.66%
1Y
6.37%
3Y*
19.16%
5Y*
-5.36%
10Y*

XLP

1D
0.40%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
6.36%
6M
5.65%
1Y
1.97%
3Y*
6.59%
5Y*
5.55%
10Y*
7.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WANT vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
WANT
Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares
-14.08%-6.94%60.52%114.43%-83.03%84.81%45.26%90.07%-24.91%
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
6.36%1.52%12.20%-0.82%-0.81%17.20%10.11%27.43%-8.33%

Correlation

The correlation between WANT and XLP is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2018

0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between WANT and XLP has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

WANT vs. XLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WANT
XLP

Consumer Cyclical

19.4%
1.0%

Communication Services

0.3%

-

Technology

0.2%

-

Industrials

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

99.0%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

WANT
19.4%
XLP
1.0%

Communication Services

WANT
0.3%
XLP

-

Technology

WANT
0.2%
XLP

-

Industrials

WANT
0.0%
XLP

-

Basic Materials

WANT

-

XLP

-

Consumer Defensive

WANT

-

XLP
99.0%

Energy

WANT

-

XLP

-

Financial Services

WANT

-

XLP

-

Healthcare

WANT

-

XLP

-

Real Estate

WANT

-

XLP

-

Utilities

WANT

-

XLP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WANT vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WANT
WANT Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
WANT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WANT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
WANT Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
WANT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
WANT Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

XLP
XLP Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
XLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLP Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
XLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLP Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WANT vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WANTXLPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.04

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.16

0.20

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.42

0.40

+0.02

WANT vs. XLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WANT Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is comparable to the XLP Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WANT and XLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WANTXLPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

0.16

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.42

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.43

-0.32

Drawdowns

WANT vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WANT drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, which is greater than XLP's maximum drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WANT and XLP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WANTXLPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.89%

-35.90%

-49.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.27%

-9.69%

-31.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.53%

-12.39%

-51.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.89%

-16.30%

-69.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.58%

-8.21%

-50.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.07%

-7.06%

-36.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.11%

4.93%

+10.18%

Volatility

WANT vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) has a higher volatility of 15.45% compared to State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) at 3.97%. This indicates that WANT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WANTXLPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.45%

3.97%

+11.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.86%

9.86%

+29.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.92%

12.66%

+41.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.65%

13.29%

+57.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

71.50%

14.73%

+56.77%

WANT vs. XLP - Expense Ratio Comparison

WANT has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than XLP's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

WANT vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison

WANT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than XLP's 2.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WANT
Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares
0.62%0.65%0.61%0.46%0.00%0.00%0.07%0.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.65%2.75%2.77%2.63%2.47%2.28%2.50%2.57%3.04%2.62%2.53%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


WANT and XLP have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WANT has higher volatility (15.45%) compared to XLP (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WANT dropped -85.89% vs XLP's -35.90%.

On 5-year performance, XLP leads with 5.55% vs -5.36% for WANT. On fees, XLP is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLP has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XLP has performed better with a 5.55% return vs -5.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLP is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for WANT.

XLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 0.62% for WANT.

WANT is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XLP is Consumer Staples Equities. WANT tracks S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index (-300%), while XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for WANT and 0.08% for XLP.

XLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.16 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WANT and XLP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer