WANT vs. WNTR

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

WANT (Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares) and WNTR (YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WANT is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index (-300%), while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. WANT is passively managed, while WNTR is actively managed. Over the past year, WANT returned 0.75% vs 115.98% for WNTR. At a correlation of -0.41, they often move in opposite directions. WANT charges 0.98%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for WNTR.

Performance

WANT vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WANT achieves a -21.82% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 17.65% return.

WANT

• 1D: -4.08%
• 1M: -15.52%
• YTD: -21.82%
• 6M: -27.97%
• 1Y: 0.75%
• 3Y*: 11.17%
• 5Y*: -9.26%
• 10Y*: —

WNTR

• 1D: 6.51%
• 1M: 45.64%
• YTD: 17.65%
• 6M: 21.49%
• 1Y: 115.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WANT vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WANT Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares	-21.82%	32.69%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	17.65%	52.78%

Correlation

The correlation between WANT and WNTR is -0.36, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	-0.41

Return for Risk

WANT vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WANT

WANT Risk / Return Rank: 10
WANT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
WANT Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
WANT Omega Ratio Rank: 11
WANT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
WANT Martin Ratio Rank: 9

WNTR

WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 63
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 64
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WANT vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WANT	WNTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.01	2.20	-2.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.41	2.46	-2.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.33	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.02	2.73	-2.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.05	6.99	-6.94

WANT vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WANT Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WANT and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WANT vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WANT drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, which is greater than WNTR's maximum drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WANT and WNTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	WANT	WNTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.89%	-42.65%	-43.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.27%	-42.65%	+1.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-63.53%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-85.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-62.32%	-4.02%	-58.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.18%	-20.87%	-22.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.35%	16.66%	-0.31%

Volatility

WANT vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) has a higher volatility of 19.71% compared to YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) at 18.14%. This indicates that WANT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WANT	WNTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.71%	18.14%	+1.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.30%	46.41%	-5.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.92%	53.16%	+1.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.02%	53.31%	+17.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	71.47%	53.31%	+18.16%

WANT vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

WANT has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

WANT vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

WANT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than WNTR's 94.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
WANT Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares	0.57%	0.65%	0.61%	0.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.07%	0.64%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	94.34%	58.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WANT and WNTR in my portfolio?

WANT and WNTR have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WANT or WNTR?

WANT has higher volatility (19.71%) compared to WNTR (18.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WANT dropped -85.89% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

Which ETF is better, WANT or WNTR?

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 115.98% vs 0.75% for WANT. On fees, WANT is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, WNTR has been the lower-risk option at 18.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WANT or WNTR?

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 115.98% return vs 0.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WANT or WNTR?

WANT is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WANT or WNTR?

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 94.34%, compared with 0.57% for WANT.

What is the main difference between WANT and WNTR?

WANT is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for WANT and 1.01% for WNTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.