PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WANT vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WANT vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WANT achieves a -14.08% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 64.46% return.


WANT

1D
-2.18%
1M
-3.95%
YTD
-14.08%
6M
-14.66%
1Y
6.37%
3Y*
19.16%
5Y*
-5.36%
10Y*

TQQQ

1D
-0.76%
1M
33.35%
YTD
64.46%
6M
55.93%
1Y
137.89%
3Y*
69.49%
5Y*
28.37%
10Y*
45.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WANT vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
WANT
Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares
-14.08%-6.94%60.52%114.43%-83.03%84.81%45.26%90.07%-24.91%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
64.46%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-25.30%

Correlation

The correlation between WANT and TQQQ is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2018

0.83

The correlation between WANT and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WANT vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WANT
TQQQ

Consumer Cyclical

19.4%
12.3%

Communication Services

0.3%
15.8%

Technology

0.2%
53.8%

Industrials

0.0%
2.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

WANT
19.4%
TQQQ
12.3%

Communication Services

WANT
0.3%
TQQQ
15.8%

Technology

WANT
0.2%
TQQQ
53.8%

Industrials

WANT
0.0%
TQQQ
2.8%

Basic Materials

WANT

-

TQQQ
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

WANT

-

TQQQ
7.7%

Energy

WANT

-

TQQQ
0.6%

Financial Services

WANT

-

TQQQ
0.2%

Healthcare

WANT

-

TQQQ
4.2%

Real Estate

WANT

-

TQQQ
0.1%

Utilities

WANT

-

TQQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WANT vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WANT
WANT Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
WANT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WANT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
WANT Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
WANT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
WANT Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WANT vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WANTTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.40

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.16

3.75

-3.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.42

12.27

-11.85

WANT vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WANT Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WANT and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WANTTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

2.92

-2.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.43

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.74

-0.62

Drawdowns

WANT vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WANT drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WANT and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WANTTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.89%

-81.66%

-4.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.27%

-36.97%

-4.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.53%

-58.04%

-5.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.89%

-81.66%

-4.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.58%

-0.76%

-57.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.07%

-18.52%

-24.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.11%

11.28%

+3.83%

Volatility

WANT vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) has a higher volatility of 15.45% compared to ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) at 13.29%. This indicates that WANT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WANTTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.45%

13.29%

+2.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.86%

36.04%

+2.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.92%

47.60%

+6.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.65%

66.53%

+4.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

71.50%

65.96%

+5.54%

WANT vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

WANT has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

WANT vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

WANT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, more than TQQQ's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.36%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%
WANT
Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares
0.62%0.65%0.61%0.46%0.00%0.00%0.07%0.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WANT and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WANT has higher volatility (15.45%) compared to TQQQ (13.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WANT dropped -85.89% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 5-year performance, TQQQ leads with 28.37% vs -5.36% for WANT. On fees, TQQQ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, TQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 13.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 28.37% return vs -5.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TQQQ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for WANT.

WANT has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.36% for TQQQ.

WANT tracks S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index (-300%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for WANT and 0.95% for TQQQ.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WANT and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer