WANT vs. NBIG

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

WANT (Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares) and NBIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. WANT is passively managed, while NBIG is actively managed. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. WANT charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NBIG.

Performance

WANT vs. NBIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WANT achieves a -14.35% return, which is significantly lower than NBIG's 179.36% return.

WANT

• 1D: 5.55%
• 1M: 0.14%
• 6M: -18.34%
• YTD: -14.35%
• 1Y: 7.55%
• 3Y*: 10.00%
• 5Y*: -8.28%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.92%

NBIG

• 1D: 23.39%
• 1M: -21.75%
• 6M: 170.93%
• YTD: 179.36%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF	$54.25M	$46.33M	$38.34M
WANT Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares	$2.02M	$1.30M	$1.32M

WANT vs. NBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WANT Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares	-14.35%	-1.92%
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF	179.36%	-59.80%

Correlation

The correlation between WANT and NBIG is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025	0.20

Return for Risk

WANT vs. NBIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WANT

WANT Risk / Return Rank: 15
WANT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
WANT Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
WANT Omega Ratio Rank: 17
WANT Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
WANT Martin Ratio Rank: 14

NBIG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WANT vs. NBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WANT	NBIG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.13	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.59	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.18	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.40	—	—

Drawdowns

WANT vs. NBIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WANT drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, which is greater than NBIG's maximum drawdown of -78.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WANT and NBIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	WANT	NBIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.89%	-78.77%	-7.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.27%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-63.53%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-85.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-58.72%	-58.80%	+0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.42%	-42.17%	-1.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.70%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WANT	NBIG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.32%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	44.85%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.50%	219.67%	-162.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.48%	219.67%	-148.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	71.45%	219.67%	-148.22%

WANT vs. NBIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

WANT has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than NBIG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

WANT vs. NBIG - Dividend Comparison

WANT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, while NBIG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WANT Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares	0.52%	0.65%	0.61%	0.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.07%	0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WANT and NBIG in my portfolio?

WANT and NBIG have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WANT or NBIG?

On fees, NBIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WANT or NBIG?

NBIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for WANT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WANT or NBIG?

WANT has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.00% for NBIG.

What is the main difference between WANT and NBIG?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for WANT and 0.75% for NBIG.