PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WANT vs. HIBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WANT vs. HIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WANT achieves a -14.95% return, which is significantly lower than HIBL's 80.33% return.


WANT

1D
0.66%
1M
-7.09%
YTD
-14.95%
6M
-17.60%
1Y
8.18%
3Y*
12.79%
5Y*
-6.22%
10Y*

HIBL

1D
4.55%
1M
15.37%
YTD
80.33%
6M
73.92%
1Y
226.21%
3Y*
49.52%
5Y*
10.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WANT vs. HIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
WANT
Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares
-14.95%-6.94%60.52%114.43%-83.03%84.81%45.26%8.39%
HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
80.33%60.38%-0.40%81.02%-68.24%129.14%-24.96%19.23%

Correlation

The correlation between WANT and HIBL is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2019

0.76

The correlation between WANT and HIBL shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WANT vs. HIBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WANT
HIBL

Consumer Cyclical

18.4%
12.9%

Communication Services

0.2%
3.7%

Technology

0.2%
45.8%

Industrials

0.0%
11.7%

Basic Materials

-

4.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.6%

Energy

-

2.2%

Financial Services

-

12.5%

Healthcare

-

2.9%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

WANT
18.4%
HIBL
12.9%

Communication Services

WANT
0.2%
HIBL
3.7%

Technology

WANT
0.2%
HIBL
45.8%

Industrials

WANT
0.0%
HIBL
11.7%

Basic Materials

WANT

-

HIBL
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

WANT

-

HIBL
0.6%

Energy

WANT

-

HIBL
2.2%

Financial Services

WANT

-

HIBL
12.5%

Healthcare

WANT

-

HIBL
2.9%

Real Estate

WANT

-

HIBL

-

Utilities

WANT

-

HIBL
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WANT vs. HIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WANT
WANT Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
WANT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WANT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
WANT Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
WANT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
WANT Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

HIBL
HIBL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
HIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
HIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WANT vs. HIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WANTHIBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.40

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

7.25

-7.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.52

25.38

-24.85

WANT vs. HIBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WANT Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the HIBL Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WANT and HIBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WANT vs. HIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WANT drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, roughly equal to the maximum HIBL drawdown of -88.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WANT and HIBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WANTHIBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.89%

-88.27%

+2.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.27%

-31.39%

-9.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.53%

-69.66%

+6.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.89%

-81.58%

-4.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.01%

-10.19%

-48.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.11%

-44.05%

+0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.68%

8.96%

+6.72%

Volatility

WANT vs. HIBL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) is 18.43%, while Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) has a volatility of 34.70%. This indicates that WANT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WANTHIBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.43%

34.70%

-16.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.93%

57.54%

-17.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.30%

71.43%

-17.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.78%

83.04%

-12.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

71.47%

92.32%

-20.85%

WANT vs. HIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

WANT has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than HIBL's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

WANT vs. HIBL - Dividend Comparison

WANT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than HIBL's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
1.28%2.43%0.82%0.69%0.00%0.06%0.19%0.19%
WANT
Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares
0.63%0.65%0.61%0.46%0.00%0.00%0.07%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


WANT and HIBL have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HIBL has higher volatility (34.70%) compared to WANT (18.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WANT dropped -85.89% vs HIBL's -88.27%.

On 5-year performance, HIBL leads with 10.57% vs -6.22% for WANT. On fees, WANT is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, WANT has been the lower-risk option at 18.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HIBL has performed better with a 10.57% return vs -6.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WANT is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for HIBL.

HIBL has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.63% for WANT.

WANT tracks S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index (-300%), while HIBL tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.98% for WANT and 1.12% for HIBL.

HIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WANT and HIBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer