WANT vs. FAS

Last updated Jul 22, 2026

WANT (Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares) and FAS (Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - WANT tracks the S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index (-300%) while FAS tracks the Financial Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WANT returned -9.92%/yr vs 13.19%/yr for FAS. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WANT charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for FAS.

Performance

WANT vs. FAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) and Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF (FAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WANT achieves a -19.95% return, which is significantly lower than FAS's 0.21% return.

WANT

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: -6.84%
• 6M: -18.61%
• YTD: -19.95%
• 1Y: -9.28%
• 3Y*: 7.62%
• 5Y*: -9.92%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.01%

FAS

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 14.66%
• 6M: 10.47%
• YTD: 0.21%
• 1Y: 9.01%
• 3Y*: 37.42%
• 5Y*: 13.19%
• 10Y*: 21.50%
• ALL TIME*: 13.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WANT vs. FAS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
WANT Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares	-19.95%	-6.94%	60.52%	114.43%	-83.03%	84.81%	45.26%	90.07%	-24.44%
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF	0.21%	21.48%	84.47%	14.92%	-43.19%	116.59%	-34.97%	113.04%	-28.42%

Correlation

The correlation between WANT and FAS is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2018	0.65

The correlation between WANT and FAS shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WANT vs. FAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WANT	FAS
Consumer Cyclical	21.3%	-
Communication Services	0.4%	-
Technology	0.2%	1.6%
Industrials	0.1%	0.2%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	98.2%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

WANT vs. FAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WANT

WANT Risk / Return Rank: 9
WANT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
WANT Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
WANT Omega Ratio Rank: 10
WANT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
WANT Martin Ratio Rank: 8

FAS

FAS Risk / Return Rank: 15
FAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
FAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
FAS Omega Ratio Rank: 16
FAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
FAS Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WANT vs. FAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) and Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF (FAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WANT	FAS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.17	0.21	-0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.14	0.58	-0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.07	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.23	0.22	-0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.53	0.49	-1.02

WANT vs. FAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WANT Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the FAS Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WANT and FAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WANT vs. FAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WANT drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, smaller than the maximum FAS drawdown of -91.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WANT and FAS.

Drawdown Indicators

	WANT	FAS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.89%	-91.61%	+5.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.27%	-40.88%	-0.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-63.53%	-43.10%	-20.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-85.89%	-66.88%	-19.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-85.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-61.42%	-8.06%	-53.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.33%	-31.02%	-12.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.64%	18.46%	-0.82%

Volatility

WANT vs. FAS - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) has a higher volatility of 15.21% compared to Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF (FAS) at 11.68%. This indicates that WANT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WANT	FAS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.21%	11.68%	+3.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.82%	33.49%	+8.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	55.28%	43.44%	+11.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.09%	54.96%	+16.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	71.29%	61.10%	+10.19%

WANT vs. FAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

WANT has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than FAS's 0.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

WANT vs. FAS - Dividend Comparison

WANT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than FAS's 8.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF	8.37%	8.21%	0.76%	1.77%	0.91%	0.60%	0.47%	0.62%	1.43%	0.11%
WANT Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares	0.55%	0.65%	0.61%	0.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.07%	0.64%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WANT and FAS in my portfolio?

WANT and FAS have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WANT or FAS?

WANT has higher volatility (15.21%) compared to FAS (11.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WANT dropped -85.89% vs FAS's -91.61%.

Which ETF is better, WANT or FAS?

On 5-year performance, FAS leads with 13.19% vs -9.92% for WANT. On fees, FAS is cheaper at 0.88% per year. On volatility, FAS has been the lower-risk option at 11.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WANT or FAS?

Over the 5-year period, FAS has performed better with a 13.19% return vs -9.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WANT or FAS?

FAS is cheaper with a 0.88% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for WANT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WANT or FAS?

FAS has the higher dividend yield at 8.37%, compared with 0.55% for WANT.

What is the main difference between WANT and FAS?

WANT tracks S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index (-300%), while FAS tracks Financial Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for WANT and 0.88% for FAS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.21 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.