WANT vs. EINC
WANT (Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WANT is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index (-300%), while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WANT returned -8.83%/yr vs 21.18%/yr for EINC. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WANT charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.
Performance
WANT vs. EINC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WANT achieves a -21.36% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 25.97% return.
WANT
- 1D
- -3.36%
- 1M
- -14.54%
- YTD
- -21.36%
- 6M
- -26.83%
- 1Y
- -0.82%
- 3Y*
- 9.94%
- 5Y*
- -8.83%
- 10Y*
- —
EINC
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- -4.50%
- YTD
- 25.97%
- 6M
- 25.98%
- 1Y
- 29.82%
- 3Y*
- 30.36%
- 5Y*
- 21.18%
- 10Y*
- 12.03%
WANT vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WANT Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares | -21.36% | -6.94% | 60.52% | 114.43% | -83.03% | 84.81% | 45.26% | 90.07% | -24.44% |
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 25.97% | 7.11% | 42.79% | 15.55% | 19.18% | 38.05% | -19.89% | 16.98% | -11.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between WANT and EINC is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2018 | 0.35 |
The correlation between WANT and EINC shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
WANT vs. EINC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WANT
EINC
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
WANT
EINC
-
Communication Services
WANT
EINC
-
Technology
WANT
EINC
-
Industrials
WANT
EINC
Basic Materials
WANT
-
EINC
-
Consumer Defensive
WANT
-
EINC
-
Energy
WANT
-
EINC
Financial Services
WANT
-
EINC
-
Healthcare
WANT
-
EINC
-
Real Estate
WANT
-
EINC
-
Utilities
WANT
-
EINC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WANT vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank
WANT
EINC
WANT vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WANT | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.35 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 3.80 | -3.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.05 | 9.63 | -9.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WANT vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WANT drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, roughly equal to the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WANT and EINC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WANT | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.89% | -87.55% | +1.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.27% | -7.89% | -33.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.53% | -16.01% | -47.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.89% | -19.87% | -66.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -68.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.10% | -4.50% | -57.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.16% | -44.15% | +0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.14% | 3.10% | +13.04% |
Volatility
WANT vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) has a higher volatility of 19.12% compared to VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) at 6.51%. This indicates that WANT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WANT | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.12% | 6.51% | +12.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.03% | 11.88% | +29.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.06% | 15.10% | +39.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.98% | 19.54% | +51.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.48% | 25.43% | +46.05% |
WANT vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison
WANT has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
WANT vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison
WANT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than EINC's 3.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 3.51% | 4.51% | 3.33% | 3.77% | 2.89% | 6.03% | 6.69% | 9.66% | 11.31% | 8.53% | 9.71% | 28.53% |
WANT Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares | 0.68% | 0.65% | 0.61% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WANT and EINC have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WANT has higher volatility (19.12%) compared to EINC (6.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WANT dropped -85.89% vs EINC's -87.55%.
On 5-year performance, EINC leads with 21.18% vs -8.83% for WANT. On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, EINC has been the lower-risk option at 6.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EINC has performed better with a 21.18% return vs -8.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for WANT.
EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 0.68% for WANT.
WANT is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while EINC is Energy Equities. WANT tracks S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index (-300%), while EINC tracks MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for WANT and 0.45% for EINC.
EINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WANT and EINC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer