PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WANT vs. CAOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WANT vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WANT vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
WANT
Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares
-27.59%-6.94%60.52%58.47%
CAOS
Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF
1.10%2.55%5.33%7.97%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WANT achieves a -27.59% return, which is significantly lower than CAOS's 1.10% return.


WANT

1D
9.51%
1M
-20.46%
YTD
-27.59%
6M
-31.77%
1Y
4.86%
3Y*
16.80%
5Y*
-8.31%
10Y*

CAOS

1D
0.07%
1M
0.43%
YTD
1.10%
6M
1.37%
1Y
3.19%
3Y*
5.46%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


WANT vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

WANT has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

WANT vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WANT
WANT Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
WANT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WANT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
WANT Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
WANT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
WANT Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

CAOS
CAOS Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
CAOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAOS Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
CAOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAOS Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WANT vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WANTCAOSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.07

0.69

-0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.62

0.97

-0.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.26

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

0.83

-0.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.41

1.38

-0.97

WANT vs. CAOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WANT Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the CAOS Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WANT and CAOS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WANTCAOSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

0.69

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

1.27

-1.19

Correlation

The correlation between WANT and CAOS is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

WANT vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison

WANT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, while CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
WANT
Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares
0.74%0.65%0.61%0.46%0.00%0.00%0.07%0.64%
CAOS
Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

WANT vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WANT drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WANT and CAOS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


WANTCAOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.89%

-3.60%

-82.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.27%

-3.60%

-37.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.10%

-0.80%

-64.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.73%

-0.90%

-41.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.89%

2.18%

+11.71%

Volatility

WANT vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) has a higher volatility of 21.88% compared to Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) at 0.74%. This indicates that WANT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


WANTCAOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.88%

0.74%

+21.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.60%

1.30%

+39.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.65%

4.68%

+64.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.48%

4.37%

+66.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

71.85%

4.37%

+67.48%