WANT vs. BMNG
WANT (Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares) and BMNG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. WANT is passively managed, while BMNG is actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WANT charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BMNG.
Performance
WANT vs. BMNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WANT achieves a -17.53% return, which is significantly higher than BMNG's -83.14% return.
WANT
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -3.03%
- 6M
- -26.34%
- YTD
- -17.53%
- 1Y
- -5.66%
- 3Y*
- 6.02%
- 5Y*
- -8.98%
- 10Y*
- —
BMNG
- 1D
- -4.71%
- 1M
- -22.33%
- 6M
- -86.67%
- YTD
- -83.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WANT vs. BMNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WANT Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares | -17.53% | -1.92% |
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF | -83.14% | -80.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between WANT and BMNG is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WANT vs. BMNG — Risk / Return Rank
WANT
BMNG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
WANT vs. BMNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WANT | BMNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.33 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WANT vs. BMNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WANT drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, smaller than the maximum BMNG drawdown of -97.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WANT and BMNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WANT | BMNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.89% | -97.32% | +11.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.25% | -96.86% | +36.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.28% | -83.13% | +39.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.22% | — | — |
Volatility
WANT vs. BMNG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WANT | BMNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.06% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.67% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.21% | 185.89% | -130.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.13% | 185.89% | -114.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.35% | 185.89% | -114.54% |
WANT vs. BMNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
WANT has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than BMNG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
WANT vs. BMNG - Dividend Comparison
WANT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, while BMNG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WANT Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares | 0.54% | 0.65% | 0.61% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WANT and BMNG have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BMNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BMNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for WANT.
WANT has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.00% for BMNG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for WANT and 0.75% for BMNG.
Find the right allocation for WANT and BMNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer