WAMVX vs. WAGSX
WAMVX (Wasatch Micro Cap Value Fund) and WAGSX (Wasatch Global Select Fund) are both mutual funds - WAMVX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Wasatch, while WAGSX is a Global Equities fund managed by Wasatch. Over the past 5 years, WAMVX returned 4.48%/yr vs -1.67%/yr for WAGSX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WAMVX charges 1.66%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for WAGSX.
Performance
WAMVX vs. WAGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WAMVX achieves a 12.65% return, which is significantly higher than WAGSX's 1.14% return.
WAMVX
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 12.65%
- 6M
- 12.63%
- 1Y
- 28.36%
- 3Y*
- 18.67%
- 5Y*
- 4.48%
- 10Y*
- 13.90%
WAGSX
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- 1.14%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- -5.41%
- 3Y*
- 5.82%
- 5Y*
- -1.67%
- 10Y*
- —
WAMVX vs. WAGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WAMVX Wasatch Micro Cap Value Fund | 12.65% | 9.31% | 24.40% | 13.13% | -28.95% | 26.17% | 41.10% | 12.72% |
WAGSX Wasatch Global Select Fund | 1.14% | 1.74% | 0.50% | 27.77% | -33.10% | 7.95% | 34.68% | 9.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between WAMVX and WAGSX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2019 | 0.81 |
The correlation between WAMVX and WAGSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WAMVX vs. WAGSX — Risk / Return Rank
WAMVX
WAGSX
WAMVX vs. WAGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Micro Cap Value Fund (WAMVX) and Wasatch Global Select Fund (WAGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WAMVX | WAGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 0.96 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | -0.26 | +2.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.05 | -0.63 | +7.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WAMVX | WAGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | -0.31 | +1.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | -0.09 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.25 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
WAMVX vs. WAGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WAMVX drawdown since its inception was -60.71%, which is greater than WAGSX's maximum drawdown of -43.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAMVX and WAGSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WAMVX | WAGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.71% | -43.62% | -17.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.33% | -17.76% | +4.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.66% | -18.11% | -5.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.69% | -43.62% | +4.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -18.30% | +17.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.23% | -17.75% | +7.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.99% | 7.34% | -3.35% |
Volatility
WAMVX vs. WAGSX - Volatility Comparison
Wasatch Micro Cap Value Fund (WAMVX) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to Wasatch Global Select Fund (WAGSX) at 4.99%. This indicates that WAMVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WAGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WAMVX | WAGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | 4.99% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.04% | 12.09% | +1.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.18% | 14.98% | +4.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.57% | 19.64% | +0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.33% | 21.11% | +0.22% |
WAMVX vs. WAGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WAMVX has a 1.66% expense ratio, which is higher than WAGSX's 1.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
WAMVX vs. WAGSX - Dividend Comparison
WAMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.94%, while WAGSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WAGSX Wasatch Global Select Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 12.65% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WAMVX Wasatch Micro Cap Value Fund | 9.94% | 11.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 22.38% | 13.06% | 9.03% | 13.59% | 7.98% | 1.67% | 12.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WAMVX and WAGSX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WAMVX has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to WAGSX (4.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WAMVX dropped -60.71% vs WAGSX's -43.62%.
WAMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WAMVX and WAGSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer