WAMCX vs. WAGOX
WAMCX (Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund) and WAGOX (Wasatch Global Opportunities Fund) are both mutual funds - WAMCX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Wasatch, while WAGOX is a Global Equities fund managed by Wasatch. Over the past 10 years, WAMCX returned 12.41%/yr vs 9.58%/yr for WAGOX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WAMCX charges 1.16%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for WAGOX.
Performance
WAMCX vs. WAGOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WAMCX achieves a 12.91% return, which is significantly higher than WAGOX's 6.40% return. Over the past 10 years, WAMCX has outperformed WAGOX with an annualized return of 12.41%, while WAGOX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.58% annualized return.
WAMCX
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 4.20%
- 6M
- 8.96%
- YTD
- 12.91%
- 1Y
- 21.78%
- 3Y*
- 7.33%
- 5Y*
- -3.95%
- 10Y*
- 12.41%
WAGOX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- YTD
- 6.40%
- 1Y
- -1.68%
- 3Y*
- 5.92%
- 5Y*
- -1.20%
- 10Y*
- 9.58%
WAMCX vs. WAGOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WAMCX Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund | 12.91% | -2.85% | 8.25% | 19.19% | -39.71% | 5.23% | 71.48% | 38.09% | 10.34% | 31.60% |
WAGOX Wasatch Global Opportunities Fund | 6.40% | -4.58% | 6.60% | 25.57% | -35.02% | 21.43% | 42.27% | 33.11% | -7.41% | 37.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between WAMCX and WAGOX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2008 | 0.86 |
The correlation between WAMCX and WAGOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WAMCX vs. WAGOX — Risk / Return Rank
WAMCX
WAGOX
WAMCX vs. WAGOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund (WAMCX) and Wasatch Global Opportunities Fund (WAGOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WAMCX | WAGOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.98 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | -0.17 | +1.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.92 | -0.40 | +4.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WAMCX vs. WAGOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WAMCX drawdown since its inception was -66.51%, which is greater than WAGOX's maximum drawdown of -44.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAMCX and WAGOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WAMCX | WAGOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.51% | -44.05% | -22.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.89% | -16.72% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.21% | -22.43% | -10.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.18% | -44.05% | -9.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.18% | -44.05% | -9.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.13% | -17.84% | -6.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.19% | -10.17% | -5.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.04% | 7.08% | -2.04% |
Volatility
WAMCX vs. WAGOX - Volatility Comparison
Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund (WAMCX) has a higher volatility of 6.39% compared to Wasatch Global Opportunities Fund (WAGOX) at 5.39%. This indicates that WAMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WAGOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WAMCX | WAGOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.39% | 5.39% | +1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.62% | 12.08% | +4.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.95% | 15.74% | +6.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.52% | 20.70% | +6.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.61% | 20.51% | +5.10% |
WAMCX vs. WAGOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WAMCX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is lower than WAGOX's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
WAMCX vs. WAGOX - Dividend Comparison
WAMCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WAGOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WAGOX Wasatch Global Opportunities Fund | 8.77% | 9.34% | 8.83% | 0.00% | 2.30% | 7.98% | 1.96% | 8.64% | 18.77% | 11.04% | 9.13% | 13.52% |
WAMCX Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 12.08% | 2.99% | 1.96% | 7.65% | 11.92% | 11.44% | 9.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WAMCX and WAGOX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WAMCX has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to WAGOX (5.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WAMCX dropped -66.51% vs WAGOX's -44.05%.
WAMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WAMCX and WAGOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer