WAMA vs. ONOF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

WAMA (WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund) and ONOF (Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds - WAMA tracks the WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Index while ONOF tracks the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Risk Management Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. WAMA charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ONOF.

Performance

WAMA vs. ONOF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF (ONOF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

WAMA

• 1D: -1.21%
• 1M: -1.31%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ONOF

• 1D: -1.18%
• 1M: -1.14%
• YTD: 4.74%
• 6M: 3.77%
• 1Y: 19.41%
• 3Y*: 12.23%
• 5Y*: 8.47%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAMA vs. ONOF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund	0.33%
ONOF Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF	1.90%

Correlation

The correlation between WAMA and ONOF is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026	0.95

Return for Risk

WAMA vs. ONOF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WAMA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ONOF

ONOF Risk / Return Rank: 53
ONOF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
ONOF Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
ONOF Omega Ratio Rank: 49
ONOF Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
ONOF Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WAMA vs. ONOF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF (ONOF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WAMA	ONOF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.65	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.24	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.29	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.84	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.41	—

Drawdowns

WAMA vs. ONOF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAMA drawdown since its inception was -4.37%, smaller than the maximum ONOF drawdown of -26.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAMA and ONOF.

Drawdown Indicators

	WAMA	ONOF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.37%	-26.21%	+21.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.86%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.67%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.21%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.20%	-3.07%	-0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.13%	-6.11%	+4.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.07%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WAMA	ONOF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.75%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.90%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.24%	11.87%	+2.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.24%	14.42%	-0.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.24%	14.39%	-0.15%

WAMA vs. ONOF - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAMA has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than ONOF's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

WAMA vs. ONOF - Dividend Comparison

WAMA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ONOF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ONOF Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF	1.32%	1.38%	0.93%	1.37%	1.92%	0.69%
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WAMA and ONOF in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, WAMA and ONOF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, WAMA or ONOF?

On fees, WAMA is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WAMA or ONOF?

WAMA is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ONOF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WAMA or ONOF?

ONOF has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.00% for WAMA.

What is the main difference between WAMA and ONOF?

WAMA tracks WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Index, while ONOF tracks Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Risk Management Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for WAMA and 0.39% for ONOF.