WALSX vs. RLSIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WALSX (Wasatch Long/Short Alpha Fund) and RLSIX (RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 3 years, WALSX returned 6.19%/yr vs 12.73%/yr for RLSIX. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 1.75% expense ratio.

Performance

WALSX vs. RLSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wasatch Long/Short Alpha Fund (WALSX) and RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund (RLSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WALSX achieves a 5.30% return, which is significantly higher than RLSIX's -1.88% return.

WALSX

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 5.30%
• 6M: 2.38%
• 1Y: -4.23%
• 3Y*: 6.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RLSIX

• 1D: -1.30%
• 1M: 0.33%
• YTD: -1.88%
• 6M: -2.32%
• 1Y: 7.06%
• 3Y*: 12.73%
• 5Y*: -3.54%
• 10Y*: 6.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WALSX vs. RLSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
WALSX Wasatch Long/Short Alpha Fund	5.30%	-12.79%	7.24%	27.75%	-8.38%	12.20%
RLSIX RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund	-1.88%	8.57%	16.06%	43.85%	-53.89%	-5.90%

Correlation

The correlation between WALSX and RLSIX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2021	0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between WALSX and RLSIX has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

WALSX vs. RLSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WALSX

WALSX Risk / Return Rank: 2
WALSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
WALSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
WALSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
WALSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
WALSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

RLSIX

RLSIX Risk / Return Rank: 7
RLSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
RLSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
RLSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
RLSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
RLSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WALSX vs. RLSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Long/Short Alpha Fund (WALSX) and RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund (RLSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WALSX	RLSIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.18	0.63	-0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.16	0.93	-1.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.12	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.21	0.50	-0.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.40	1.49	-1.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WALSX vs. RLSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WALSX Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the RLSIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WALSX and RLSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WALSX	RLSIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18	0.63	-0.81
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.38	-0.03

Drawdowns

WALSX vs. RLSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WALSX drawdown since its inception was -25.28%, smaller than the maximum RLSIX drawdown of -60.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WALSX and RLSIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WALSX	RLSIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.28%	-60.82%	+35.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.42%	-14.56%	+1.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.28%	-17.62%	-7.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-60.82%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-60.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.15%	-27.24%	+8.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.52%	-15.08%	+5.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.12%	4.91%	+2.21%

Volatility

WALSX vs. RLSIX - Volatility Comparison

Wasatch Long/Short Alpha Fund (WALSX) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund (RLSIX) at 2.64%. This indicates that WALSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RLSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WALSX	RLSIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.15%	2.64%	+1.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.81%	9.10%	+2.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.83%	11.64%	+4.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.37%	24.95%	-8.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.37%	21.55%	-5.18%

WALSX vs. RLSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both WALSX and RLSIX have an expense ratio of 1.75%.

Dividends

WALSX vs. RLSIX - Dividend Comparison

Neither WALSX nor RLSIX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RLSIX RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	11.94%	11.66%	1.26%
WALSX Wasatch Long/Short Alpha Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WALSX and RLSIX in my portfolio?

WALSX and RLSIX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WALSX or RLSIX?

WALSX has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to RLSIX (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WALSX dropped -25.28% vs RLSIX's -60.82%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RLSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.