WALSX vs. MNWIX
WALSX (Wasatch Long/Short Alpha Fund) and MNWIX (MFS Managed Wealth Fund) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 3 years, WALSX returned 6.19%/yr vs 6.30%/yr for MNWIX. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WALSX charges 1.75%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for MNWIX.
Performance
WALSX vs. MNWIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WALSX achieves a 5.30% return, which is significantly higher than MNWIX's 1.35% return.
WALSX
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 5.30%
- 6M
- 2.38%
- 1Y
- -4.23%
- 3Y*
- 6.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MNWIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.05%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 2.12%
- 1Y
- 4.07%
- 3Y*
- 6.30%
- 5Y*
- 4.04%
- 10Y*
- 3.88%
WALSX vs. MNWIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WALSX Wasatch Long/Short Alpha Fund | 5.30% | -12.79% | 7.24% | 27.75% | -8.38% | 12.20% |
MNWIX MFS Managed Wealth Fund | 1.35% | 7.71% | 6.42% | 5.41% | -2.15% | 0.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between WALSX and MNWIX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2021 | 0.51 |
The correlation between WALSX and MNWIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WALSX vs. MNWIX — Risk / Return Rank
WALSX
MNWIX
WALSX vs. MNWIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Long/Short Alpha Fund (WALSX) and MFS Managed Wealth Fund (MNWIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WALSX | MNWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.13 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.21 | 0.72 | -0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.40 | 2.88 | -3.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WALSX | MNWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 | 0.72 | -0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.87 | -0.52 |
Drawdowns
WALSX vs. MNWIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WALSX drawdown since its inception was -25.28%, which is greater than MNWIX's maximum drawdown of -5.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WALSX and MNWIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WALSX | MNWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.28% | -5.57% | -19.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.42% | -5.57% | -7.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.28% | -5.57% | -19.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.15% | -0.15% | -19.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.52% | -1.13% | -8.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.12% | 1.39% | +5.73% |
Volatility
WALSX vs. MNWIX - Volatility Comparison
Wasatch Long/Short Alpha Fund (WALSX) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to MFS Managed Wealth Fund (MNWIX) at 1.39%. This indicates that WALSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNWIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WALSX | MNWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 1.39% | +2.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.81% | 4.40% | +7.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.83% | 5.54% | +10.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.37% | 3.97% | +12.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.37% | 3.84% | +12.53% |
WALSX vs. MNWIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WALSX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MNWIX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
WALSX vs. MNWIX - Dividend Comparison
WALSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MNWIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNWIX MFS Managed Wealth Fund | 0.75% | 0.76% | 1.13% | 0.78% | 0.70% | 0.13% | 0.24% | 0.54% | 0.42% | 0.94% | 2.65% | 1.19% |
WALSX Wasatch Long/Short Alpha Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WALSX and MNWIX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WALSX has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to MNWIX (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WALSX dropped -25.28% vs MNWIX's -5.57%.
MNWIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WALSX and MNWIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer