WAIOX vs. HLMSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Wasatch International Opportunities Fund (WAIOX) and Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio (HLMSX).
WAIOX is managed by Wasatch. It was launched on Jan 26, 2005. HLMSX is managed by Harding Loevner. It was launched on Mar 25, 2007.
Performance
WAIOX vs. HLMSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WAIOX vs. HLMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WAIOX Wasatch International Opportunities Fund | -10.06% | 2.57% | -4.49% | 10.64% | -36.63% | -1.36% | 41.75% | 32.19% | -14.69% | 27.69% |
HLMSX Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio | -5.34% | 14.87% | -6.92% | 11.78% | -24.50% | 12.82% | 18.51% | 29.45% | -17.65% | 34.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WAIOX achieves a -10.06% return, which is significantly lower than HLMSX's -5.34% return. Over the past 10 years, WAIOX has underperformed HLMSX with an annualized return of 2.46%, while HLMSX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.17% annualized return.
WAIOX
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -11.54%
- YTD
- -10.06%
- 6M
- -14.09%
- 1Y
- -7.43%
- 3Y*
- -1.42%
- 5Y*
- -9.04%
- 10Y*
- 2.46%
HLMSX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -9.34%
- YTD
- -5.34%
- 6M
- -7.18%
- 1Y
- 6.59%
- 3Y*
- 2.84%
- 5Y*
- -0.58%
- 10Y*
- 5.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WAIOX vs. HLMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WAIOX has a 1.96% expense ratio, which is higher than HLMSX's 1.37% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WAIOX vs. HLMSX — Risk / Return Rank
WAIOX
HLMSX
WAIOX vs. HLMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch International Opportunities Fund (WAIOX) and Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio (HLMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WAIOX | HLMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | 0.40 | -0.95 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | 0.61 | -1.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.08 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 0.40 | -0.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.87 | 1.03 | -1.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WAIOX | HLMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.55 | 0.40 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.54 | -0.04 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | 0.35 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.32 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between WAIOX and HLMSX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
WAIOX vs. HLMSX - Dividend Comparison
WAIOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 75.93%, more than HLMSX's 4.27% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WAIOX Wasatch International Opportunities Fund | 75.93% | 68.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.35% | 1.98% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 7.00% | 0.00% | 4.76% |
HLMSX Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio | 4.27% | 4.04% | 1.17% | 1.00% | 1.83% | 2.82% | 0.03% | 0.52% | 7.56% | 1.13% | 4.37% | 1.54% |
Drawdowns
WAIOX vs. HLMSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WAIOX drawdown since its inception was -68.04%, which is greater than HLMSX's maximum drawdown of -60.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAIOX and HLMSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WAIOX | HLMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.04% | -60.77% | -7.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.23% | -10.59% | -10.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.21% | -38.22% | -11.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.21% | -38.22% | -11.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.13% | -19.20% | -24.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.66% | -13.24% | -3.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.60% | 4.18% | +5.42% |
Volatility
WAIOX vs. HLMSX - Volatility Comparison
Wasatch International Opportunities Fund (WAIOX) has a higher volatility of 5.39% compared to Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio (HLMSX) at 5.07%. This indicates that WAIOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WAIOX | HLMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.39% | 5.07% | +0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.59% | 8.35% | +1.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.18% | 13.26% | +0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.85% | 14.90% | +1.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.37% | 14.86% | +1.51% |