WAGN vs. PID

Last updated Jul 2, 2026

WAGN (Pabrai Wagons ETF) and PID (Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF) are both Global Equities funds. WAGN is actively managed, while PID is passively managed. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. WAGN charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for PID.

Performance

WAGN vs. PID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pabrai Wagons ETF (WAGN) and Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

WAGN

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PID

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: -2.81%
• YTD: 3.40%
• 6M: 3.40%
• 1Y: 11.60%
• 3Y*: 11.25%
• 5Y*: 8.40%
• 10Y*: 8.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAGN vs. PID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
WAGN Pabrai Wagons ETF	-1.29%
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF	-0.27%

Correlation

The correlation between WAGN and PID is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2026	1.00

Return for Risk

WAGN vs. PID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WAGN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PID

PID Risk / Return Rank: 37
PID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
PID Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
PID Omega Ratio Rank: 36
PID Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
PID Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WAGN vs. PID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pabrai Wagons ETF (WAGN) and Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WAGN	PID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.20	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.79	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.21	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.56	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	4.94	—

Drawdowns

WAGN vs. PID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAGN drawdown since its inception was -1.29%, smaller than the maximum PID drawdown of -66.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAGN and PID.

Drawdown Indicators

	WAGN	PID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.29%	-66.34%	+65.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.47%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.34%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.97%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-46.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.29%	-4.10%	+2.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.15%	-13.00%	+11.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.35%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WAGN	PID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.96%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.95%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.04%	9.74%	-1.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.04%	13.96%	-5.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.04%	17.60%	-9.56%

WAGN vs. PID - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAGN has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than PID's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

WAGN vs. PID - Dividend Comparison

WAGN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF	3.60%	3.28%	3.88%	3.31%	3.30%	3.30%	3.16%	3.99%	3.87%	3.46%	3.90%	4.48%
WAGN Pabrai Wagons ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WAGN and PID in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, WAGN and PID move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, WAGN or PID?

On fees, PID is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WAGN or PID?

PID is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for WAGN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WAGN or PID?

PID has the higher dividend yield at 3.60%, compared with 0.00% for WAGN.

What is the main difference between WAGN and PID?

They also come from different issuers: Pabrai and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for WAGN and 0.56% for PID.