PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WAGN vs. CAOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WAGN vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pabrai Wagons ETF (WAGN) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


WAGN

1D
-1.86%
1M
3.70%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CAOS

1D
0.12%
1M
0.02%
YTD
0.90%
6M
0.76%
1Y
1.97%
3Y*
4.27%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAGN vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WAGN and CAOS is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2026

-0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WAGN vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WAGN

CAOS
CAOS Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
CAOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAOS Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CAOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAOS Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WAGN vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pabrai Wagons ETF (WAGN) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WAGN vs. CAOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WAGNCAOSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.14

1.21

-0.07

Drawdowns

WAGN vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAGN drawdown since its inception was -5.79%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAGN and CAOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WAGNCAOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.79%

-3.60%

-2.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.43%

-0.99%

-1.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.36%

-0.90%

-1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

Volatility

WAGN vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WAGNCAOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.75%

1.53%

+18.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.75%

4.25%

+15.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.75%

4.25%

+15.50%

WAGN vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAGN has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

WAGN vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison

Neither WAGN nor CAOS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WAGN and CAOS have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CAOS is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CAOS is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for WAGN.

WAGN and CAOS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

WAGN is categorized as Global Equities, while CAOS is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Pabrai and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for WAGN and 0.63% for CAOS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WAGN and CAOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer