WAEMX vs. WGROX
WAEMX (Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund) and WGROX (Wasatch Core Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - WAEMX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Wasatch, while WGROX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Wasatch. Over the past 10 years, WAEMX returned 8.64%/yr vs 11.24%/yr for WGROX. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WAEMX charges 1.91%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for WGROX.
Performance
WAEMX vs. WGROX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WAEMX achieves a 22.94% return, which is significantly higher than WGROX's 2.95% return. Over the past 10 years, WAEMX has underperformed WGROX with an annualized return of 8.64%, while WGROX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.24% annualized return.
WAEMX
- 1D
- -3.24%
- 1M
- -0.95%
- YTD
- 22.94%
- 6M
- 22.22%
- 1Y
- 29.67%
- 3Y*
- 12.34%
- 5Y*
- 1.27%
- 10Y*
- 8.64%
WGROX
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- 1.89%
- YTD
- 2.95%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- -2.63%
- 3Y*
- 8.14%
- 5Y*
- 0.28%
- 10Y*
- 11.24%
WAEMX vs. WGROX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WAEMX Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund | 22.94% | 5.85% | -2.21% | 21.20% | -38.76% | 30.16% | 32.79% | 27.45% | -18.97% | 38.20% |
WGROX Wasatch Core Growth Fund | 2.95% | -10.37% | 13.13% | 33.43% | -30.86% | 20.76% | 36.73% | 33.31% | -3.75% | 24.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between WAEMX and WGROX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2007 | 0.58 |
The correlation between WAEMX and WGROX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WAEMX vs. WGROX — Risk / Return Rank
WAEMX
WGROX
WAEMX vs. WGROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (WAEMX) and Wasatch Core Growth Fund (WGROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WAEMX | WGROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.01 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.14 | -0.06 | +4.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.13 | -0.14 | +12.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WAEMX vs. WGROX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WAEMX drawdown since its inception was -66.35%, which is greater than WGROX's maximum drawdown of -61.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAEMX and WGROX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WAEMX | WGROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.35% | -61.61% | -4.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.89% | -15.89% | +8.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.56% | -27.61% | +2.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.88% | -40.16% | -4.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.88% | -40.16% | -4.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.05% | -16.48% | +7.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.78% | -9.90% | -6.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 6.41% | -3.72% |
Volatility
WAEMX vs. WGROX - Volatility Comparison
Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (WAEMX) has a higher volatility of 8.04% compared to Wasatch Core Growth Fund (WGROX) at 5.66%. This indicates that WAEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WGROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WAEMX | WGROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.04% | 5.66% | +2.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.83% | 14.48% | +1.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.58% | 19.51% | -0.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 23.07% | -5.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 23.33% | -5.06% |
WAEMX vs. WGROX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WAEMX has a 1.91% expense ratio, which is higher than WGROX's 1.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
WAEMX vs. WGROX - Dividend Comparison
WAEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 57.26%, more than WGROX's 8.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WAEMX Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund | 57.26% | 70.40% | 6.49% | 0.00% | 3.32% | 6.03% | 7.15% | 5.82% | 12.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% |
WGROX Wasatch Core Growth Fund | 8.31% | 8.55% | 9.22% | 0.00% | 0.71% | 16.82% | 7.21% | 10.73% | 10.14% | 6.24% | 0.15% | 12.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WAEMX and WGROX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WAEMX has higher volatility (8.04%) compared to WGROX (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WAEMX dropped -66.35% vs WGROX's -61.61%.
WAEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WAEMX and WGROX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer