WABF vs. EUSB
WABF (Western Asset Bond ETF) and EUSB (iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. WABF is actively managed, while EUSB is passively managed. Over the past year, WABF returned 6.00% vs 4.99% for EUSB. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WABF charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for EUSB.
Performance
WABF vs. EUSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with WABF having a 0.32% return and EUSB slightly higher at 0.33%.
WABF
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- 1Y
- 6.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EUSB
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- 1Y
- 4.99%
- 3Y*
- 4.34%
- 5Y*
- 0.44%
- 10Y*
- —
WABF vs. EUSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WABF Western Asset Bond ETF | 0.32% | 7.92% | 1.30% | 6.81% |
EUSB iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF | 0.33% | 7.45% | 1.83% | 6.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between WABF and EUSB is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2023 | 0.90 |
The correlation between WABF and EUSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WABF vs. EUSB — Risk / Return Rank
WABF
EUSB
WABF vs. EUSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset Bond ETF (WABF) and iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF (EUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WABF | EUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.57 | 1.41 | +0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.36 | 2.11 | +0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.25 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 1.99 | -0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.88 | 6.02 | -0.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WABF | EUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 1.41 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | 0.05 | +0.96 |
Drawdowns
WABF vs. EUSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WABF drawdown since its inception was -5.36%, smaller than the maximum EUSB drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WABF and EUSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WABF | EUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.36% | -17.87% | +12.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.03% | -2.48% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.50% | -1.17% | -0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.51% | -6.50% | +4.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.98% | 0.82% | +0.16% |
Volatility
WABF vs. EUSB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Western Asset Bond ETF (WABF) is 1.12%, while iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF (EUSB) has a volatility of 1.20%. This indicates that WABF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WABF | EUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.12% | 1.20% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.49% | 2.50% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.85% | 3.57% | +0.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.02% | 5.77% | +0.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.02% | 5.42% | +0.60% |
WABF vs. EUSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
WABF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than EUSB's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
WABF vs. EUSB - Dividend Comparison
WABF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, more than EUSB's 3.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUSB iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF | 3.96% | 3.84% | 3.67% | 3.08% | 2.21% | 1.10% | 0.57% |
WABF Western Asset Bond ETF | 5.13% | 5.67% | 6.25% | 1.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, WABF and EUSB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EUSB has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to WABF (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WABF dropped -5.36% vs EUSB's -17.87%.
On 1-year performance, WABF leads with 6.00% vs 4.99% for EUSB. On fees, EUSB is cheaper at 0.12% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, WABF has performed better with a 6.00% return vs 4.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EUSB is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for WABF.
WABF has the higher dividend yield at 5.13%, compared with 3.96% for EUSB.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for WABF and 0.12% for EUSB.
WABF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WABF and EUSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer