PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WAARX vs. EIGMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WAARX vs. EIGMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Western Asset Total Return Unconstrained Fund (WAARX) and Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund (EIGMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WAARX achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly lower than EIGMX's 4.26% return. Over the past 10 years, WAARX has underperformed EIGMX with an annualized return of 2.23%, while EIGMX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.94% annualized return.


WAARX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.55%
YTD
0.77%
6M
0.92%
1Y
4.24%
3Y*
5.25%
5Y*
0.19%
10Y*
2.23%

EIGMX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.55%
YTD
4.26%
6M
5.18%
1Y
12.25%
3Y*
9.38%
5Y*
6.23%
10Y*
4.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAARX vs. EIGMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WAARX
Western Asset Total Return Unconstrained Fund
0.77%7.13%1.80%7.50%-13.93%-1.84%5.12%8.72%-2.65%7.69%
EIGMX
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund
4.26%11.37%8.69%6.99%-0.47%2.19%3.59%9.76%-3.29%4.29%

Correlation

The correlation between WAARX and EIGMX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2007

0.17

The correlation between WAARX and EIGMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (10 years) to 0.23 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WAARX vs. EIGMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WAARX
WAARX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
WAARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WAARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
WAARX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
WAARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
WAARX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

EIGMX
EIGMX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
EIGMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIGMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIGMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
EIGMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIGMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WAARX vs. EIGMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset Total Return Unconstrained Fund (WAARX) and Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund (EIGMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WAARXEIGMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.67

6.67

-5.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.52

10.67

-8.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

3.29

-1.95

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

8.52

-6.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.96

30.93

-23.98

WAARX vs. EIGMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WAARX Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is lower than the EIGMX Sharpe Ratio of 6.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WAARX and EIGMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WAARXEIGMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

6.67

-5.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

2.39

-2.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

1.98

-1.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

1.60

-0.73

Drawdowns

WAARX vs. EIGMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAARX drawdown since its inception was -20.10%, which is greater than EIGMX's maximum drawdown of -9.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAARX and EIGMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WAARXEIGMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.10%

-9.42%

-10.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.26%

-1.44%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.04%

-1.63%

-3.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.35%

-7.39%

-11.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.35%

-9.42%

-9.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

0.00%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.14%

-0.92%

-2.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.59%

0.40%

+0.19%

Volatility

WAARX vs. EIGMX - Volatility Comparison

Western Asset Total Return Unconstrained Fund (WAARX) has a higher volatility of 0.70% compared to Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund (EIGMX) at 0.45%. This indicates that WAARX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIGMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WAARXEIGMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.70%

0.45%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.80%

1.62%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48%

1.85%

+0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.36%

2.61%

+1.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.18%

2.50%

+1.68%

WAARX vs. EIGMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAARX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than EIGMX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

WAARX vs. EIGMX - Dividend Comparison

WAARX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, less than EIGMX's 6.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIGMX
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund
6.67%5.72%6.16%5.79%4.78%4.18%4.37%5.44%3.72%3.42%4.02%5.54%
WAARX
Western Asset Total Return Unconstrained Fund
4.84%4.40%3.86%2.54%1.04%4.40%1.59%4.30%3.69%3.59%3.18%3.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


WAARX and EIGMX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WAARX has higher volatility (0.70%) compared to EIGMX (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WAARX dropped -20.10% vs EIGMX's -9.42%.

EIGMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.67 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WAARX and EIGMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer