PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VYMI vs. DFCF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VYMI vs. DFCF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI) and Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF (DFCF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VYMI achieves a 12.90% return, which is significantly higher than DFCF's 0.63% return.


VYMI

1D
0.54%
1M
1.26%
YTD
12.90%
6M
14.90%
1Y
29.88%
3Y*
21.73%
5Y*
12.29%
10Y*
11.24%

DFCF

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.39%
YTD
0.63%
6M
1.08%
1Y
5.09%
3Y*
5.07%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VYMI vs. DFCF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VYMI
Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF
12.90%38.05%7.06%17.07%-7.02%-0.05%
DFCF
Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF
0.63%7.89%1.86%6.94%-14.48%0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between VYMI and DFCF is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2021

0.28

The correlation between VYMI and DFCF shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VYMI vs. DFCF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VYMI
VYMI Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VYMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYMI Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
VYMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYMI Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

DFCF
DFCF Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
DFCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFCF Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
DFCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFCF Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VYMI vs. DFCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI) and Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF (DFCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VYMIDFCFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.23

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

1.83

+1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.60

5.39

+6.21

VYMI vs. DFCF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VYMI Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the DFCF Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VYMI and DFCF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VYMI vs. DFCF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VYMI drawdown since its inception was -40.00%, which is greater than DFCF's maximum drawdown of -19.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VYMI and DFCF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VYMIDFCFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.00%

-19.56%

-20.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.14%

-2.79%

-7.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.84%

-5.05%

-7.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.20%

+1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.30%

-7.99%

+1.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

0.95%

+1.64%

Volatility

VYMI vs. DFCF - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI) has a higher volatility of 4.40% compared to Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF (DFCF) at 1.44%. This indicates that VYMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFCF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VYMIDFCFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

1.44%

+2.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.15%

2.98%

+8.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.33%

3.96%

+9.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.90%

6.45%

+8.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.85%

6.45%

+10.40%

VYMI vs. DFCF - Expense Ratio Comparison

VYMI has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than DFCF's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VYMI vs. DFCF - Dividend Comparison

VYMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, less than DFCF's 4.30% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DFCF
Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF
4.30%4.48%4.61%4.51%3.27%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VYMI
Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF
3.39%3.68%4.84%4.58%4.70%4.30%3.22%4.20%4.29%3.21%2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


VYMI and DFCF have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VYMI has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to DFCF (1.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VYMI dropped -40.00% vs DFCF's -19.56%.

On 3-year performance, VYMI leads with 21.73% vs 5.07% for DFCF. On fees, VYMI is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, DFCF has been the lower-risk option at 1.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VYMI has performed better with a 21.73% return vs 5.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYMI is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for DFCF.

DFCF has the higher dividend yield at 4.30%, compared with 3.39% for VYMI.

VYMI is categorized as Dividend, while DFCF is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VYMI and 0.17% for DFCF.

VYMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VYMI and DFCF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer