PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VXX vs. FMAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VXX vs. FMAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures ETN (VXX) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VXX achieves a -19.72% return, which is significantly lower than FMAY's 5.43% return.


VXX

1D
-2.61%
1M
-3.58%
6M
-22.73%
YTD
-19.72%
1Y
-53.71%
3Y*
-38.60%
5Y*
-46.47%
10Y*
-46.29%
ALL TIME*
-51.44%

FMAY

1D
0.48%
1M
0.39%
6M
4.78%
YTD
5.43%
1Y
12.00%
3Y*
12.48%
5Y*
9.00%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.41M$1.35M$5.09M
$203.07M$176.34M$224.72M

VXX vs. FMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VXX
iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures ETN
-19.72%-42.21%-26.22%-72.52%-23.80%-72.41%-54.13%
FMAY
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May
5.43%12.69%14.45%17.83%-8.08%11.00%10.80%

Correlation

The correlation between VXX and FMAY is -0.84, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2020

-0.72

The correlation between VXX and FMAY shifts across timeframes, from -0.84 (1 year) to -0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VXX vs. FMAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VXX
VXX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
VXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
VXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

FMAY
FMAY Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VXX vs. FMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures ETN (VXX) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VXXFMAYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.33

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.92

2.65

-3.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.40

13.18

-14.58

VXX vs. FMAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VXX Sharpe Ratio is -0.87, which is lower than the FMAY Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VXX and FMAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VXX vs. FMAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VXX drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than FMAY's maximum drawdown of -13.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VXX and FMAY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VXXFMAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-13.60%

-86.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.59%

-4.22%

-50.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-80.75%

-13.12%

-67.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.66%

-13.60%

-82.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-0.48%

-99.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-95.11%

-1.98%

-93.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.70%

0.85%

+34.85%

Volatility

VXX vs. FMAY - Volatility Comparison

iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures ETN (VXX) has a higher volatility of 14.47% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY) at 2.40%. This indicates that VXX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VXXFMAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.47%

2.40%

+12.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.90%

5.85%

+37.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.37%

6.86%

+50.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.63%

10.68%

+56.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.37%

10.14%

+60.23%

VXX vs. FMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

VXX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than FMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

VXX vs. FMAY - Dividend Comparison

Neither VXX nor FMAY has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VXX and FMAY have a correlation of -0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VXX has higher volatility (14.47%) compared to FMAY (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VXX dropped -100.00% vs FMAY's -13.60%.

On 5-year performance, FMAY leads with 9.00% vs -46.47% for VXX. On fees, FMAY is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, FMAY has been the lower-risk option at 2.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FMAY has performed better with a 9.00% return vs -46.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FMAY is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for VXX.

VXX and FMAY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

VXX is categorized as Volatility, while FMAY is Defined Outcome. VXX tracks S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures Index Total Return, while FMAY tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index May Series. They also come from different issuers: Barclays Capital and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for VXX and 0.85% for FMAY.

FMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VXX and FMAY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer