PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VXUS vs. WBIF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VXUS vs. WBIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VXUS achieves a 14.25% return, which is significantly higher than WBIF's 11.61% return. Over the past 10 years, VXUS has outperformed WBIF with an annualized return of 9.76%, while WBIF has yielded a comparatively lower 5.52% annualized return.


VXUS

1D
-0.99%
1M
4.68%
YTD
14.25%
6M
16.92%
1Y
32.01%
3Y*
19.30%
5Y*
8.46%
10Y*
9.76%

WBIF

1D
-0.97%
1M
5.70%
YTD
11.61%
6M
10.57%
1Y
23.01%
3Y*
8.85%
5Y*
2.38%
10Y*
5.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VXUS vs. WBIF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
14.25%32.35%5.08%15.86%-16.08%8.98%10.66%21.75%-14.43%27.46%
WBIF
WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF
11.61%9.16%3.43%0.49%-8.38%16.56%-2.71%2.68%-4.68%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between VXUS and WBIF is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2014

0.63

The correlation between VXUS and WBIF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

VXUS vs. WBIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VXUS
WBIF

Financial Services

22.3%
31.0%

Technology

18.1%
19.9%

Industrials

16.1%
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
11.1%

Basic Materials

7.6%
1.0%

Healthcare

7.1%
3.4%

Energy

5.2%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
3.1%

Communication Services

4.4%
2.6%

Utilities

3.2%
10.3%

Real Estate

2.6%

-

Financial Services

VXUS
22.3%
WBIF
31.0%

Technology

VXUS
18.1%
WBIF
19.9%

Industrials

VXUS
16.1%
WBIF
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VXUS
8.4%
WBIF
11.1%

Basic Materials

VXUS
7.6%
WBIF
1.0%

Healthcare

VXUS
7.1%
WBIF
3.4%

Energy

VXUS
5.2%
WBIF
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

VXUS
5.0%
WBIF
3.1%

Communication Services

VXUS
4.4%
WBIF
2.6%

Utilities

VXUS
3.2%
WBIF
10.3%

Real Estate

VXUS
2.6%
WBIF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VXUS vs. WBIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VXUS
VXUS Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

WBIF
WBIF Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
WBIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WBIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
WBIF Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
WBIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
WBIF Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VXUS vs. WBIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VXUSWBIFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.34

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

3.50

-0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.14

12.53

-1.39

VXUS vs. WBIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VXUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the WBIF Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VXUS and WBIF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VXUSWBIFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

1.88

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.19

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.45

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.30

+0.08

Drawdowns

VXUS vs. WBIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VXUS drawdown since its inception was -35.97%, which is greater than WBIF's maximum drawdown of -20.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VXUS and WBIF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VXUSWBIFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.97%

-20.29%

-15.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.27%

-6.60%

-4.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.58%

-17.16%

+3.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.44%

-20.29%

-9.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.97%

-20.29%

-15.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-0.97%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.22%

-7.74%

-0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

1.84%

+1.04%

Volatility

VXUS vs. WBIF - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a higher volatility of 5.60% compared to WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) at 4.13%. This indicates that VXUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WBIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VXUSWBIFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.60%

4.13%

+1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.00%

8.63%

+4.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.21%

12.31%

+2.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.05%

12.86%

+3.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.16%

12.34%

+4.82%

VXUS vs. WBIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

VXUS has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than WBIF's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

VXUS vs. WBIF - Dividend Comparison

VXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, more than WBIF's 0.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
2.66%3.18%3.37%3.24%3.09%3.10%2.14%3.06%3.18%2.73%2.93%2.83%
WBIF
WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF
0.06%0.14%1.17%0.82%0.96%2.59%0.09%1.04%0.77%0.75%0.67%0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


VXUS and WBIF have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VXUS has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to WBIF (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VXUS dropped -35.97% vs WBIF's -20.29%.

On 10-year performance, VXUS leads with 9.76% vs 5.52% for WBIF. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, WBIF has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VXUS has performed better with a 9.76% return vs 5.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for WBIF.

VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 0.06% for WBIF.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and WBI. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VXUS and 1.25% for WBIF.

VXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VXUS and WBIF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer